It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
I would define indiscriminate as being for no purpose. The closest thing I can compare it to is a pilot punching off ordnance for the hell of it. Not to attack anything.
Any chance you will ever answer the question that I posed to you?
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Besides treatment of prisoners, refugees, the hell with ethics!
War is war. War MUST be won. So forget restrictions on cluster bombs, you fight the enemy with all you've got.
The loser is always the one who tries to be "humane." War is the exact opposite of being humane, so deal.
Originally posted by Satyr
It's not as if we don't have many other more discriminate WMD in our arsenal....weapons that do damage at the time of impact, and don't indiscriminately continue to randomly blow people up for 30+ years afterward, including our own soldiers. That is, most definitely, indiscriminate.
Now you are calling CBs weapons of mass destruction? Are you serious?
As already pointed out, this has become too far off topic now. Discussion over.
Originally posted by Satyr
It's even more obvious now that you don't understand honor. You're condoning unnecessary abuse and/or torture. It doesn't matter what they were ordered to do. Illegal orders do not have to be followed, and those would definitely be illegal, since it defies the Geneva Convention. FYI, we're supposed to follow our own rules...and the ones we've agreed to. That's honor. Even Rumsfeld will tell you that. Are you still going to condone this type of treatment? You are indeed mentally ill, if so. Judging from your comments, I don't think you've ever had honor, or understood what it means. You can stay in the "dirty ape" category, as far as I'm concerned.
Originally posted by xxKrisxx
Sorry, you dont know what those people had to deal with. You dont know what those soldiers saw. You dont understand their war.
I never said it was the right thing to do, but Im not going to judge these people yet.
If I saw an enemy kill my fellow soldier, you would nt find me serving this prisoner a snack and asking them if theyd like to pen a letter home.
You didnt get my point that the "lets all be friends"
approach isnt going to work here.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I couldn't disagree more. I'm more proud of America today than I have been in many years. In the words of my Vietnamese friend, "America stands for freedom." That makes me proud.
Originally posted by AtheiX
In my opinion America does not entirely have to shame because it was the right thing to do to defeat Saddam Hussain and the Baas party - the brutal regime as bad as USSR.
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
A few weeks ago, could you have dreamed of the events we all have seen?
Can you now look away, or seek a rational way to dismiss the fact that we as a nation have been shamed in every possible way?
We are a nation of freedom, a nation of pride, and thought to have been a nation of "higher moral value"... We have felt the hand of evil, and have shown that we are no longer immune to being seen as that very evil.
Through the actions of a few, we have been hit with the shameful reality that, just because we are the world's super power, and we have all the answers to the world conflicts... we at least are no better than them... we are human beings, with flaws, and unspeakable evils, just as they are.
We are human on all sides... and this war so far has shown at least that.
No matter what is said and done from this day forward, there will be no way to erase this shame.
You can put any spin on it you want, soak up the media hype, or just avoid the topic all together. It will not change what has happened or what has been done.
Everyone is seeking justice now.. but who is just in this war now?
We are the people of this world and that is all of us... on all sides... when you can see the value of all human lives and learn the most basic respect for that life maybe we can find some real answers and move toward peace.. a real and lasting peace.
What the hell did Iraq have to do with the war on terrorism?.. someone asked me once and I made pages of answers.. but now I am willing to admit that going into Iraq had nothing to do with the war on the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11/01.
Shame on them, and now it is shame on us.
The next time we are attacked there will be many more in the middle east and a great deal of the world who will say "they had it coming" or they got what they deserved"
The impact of the recent events of this war will take years to evolve.. and even longer to understand.. we exposed to the world our basic flaw of being human and can become evil in every possible way.
War On Terrorism?
Show me who the real terrorists are now!... better yet show me where they are.
Think! ... a brain is only a waste as long as you are without an open mind.
Gazz
[Edited on 7-5-2004 by UM_Gazz]
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
For the record, I am not a liberal!
My voting record is almost consistant and very republican, This is America and I think it is still ok to be Republican and very against this war!
I was a strong supporter of this war until the day I was able to see the true evil of war, and mainly the war in Iraq, a war that im my opinion has done more damage to both the Iraqi people, their nation and to the reputation of the United States of America than time will ever be able to repair.
There is no turning back now, and like it or not shame is what it is.. you can try to sweep this shame under the rug all you want. but one way or the other you will have to deal with it. And that is the greatest shame of all.
We once were a proud nation, it is hard to have a sense of pride now when you know your nation is in a war based on false information and an Israeli agenda. Taken advantage of by a company linked to the Vice president himself.
Sorry for calling it as I see it, if that offends you.
But I am not sorry for my opinion, and neither should you be.
Saddam Hussein and his regime had little if nothing to do with the events that occured on September the 11th of 2001. Saddam Hussein and his regime had built weapons of mass destruction before and they showed their willingness to use them by gassing the Iranians and the Kurds.
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
Most of what you say rings true. However before the attacks of 9/11/01 our own leaders in the republican party were bragging about how well the sanctions on Iraq were working, and that Saddam's regime was becoming more irelevant with each passing day. and how the no fly zones were working well to contain Saddam's military threat, We were told how weakened his military was and how most of his WMD had been done away with.
Suddenly it all changed after 9/11 and Saddam's Iraq once again became a urgent threat to our security.
Was it good to remove Saddam?... Yes.. But what about the misinformation? false reports, they have already been forced to admit to??
It was easy for me to support the war after what happened on 9/11... But the truth found its way to the surface later.. and that truth is still too hard for some to accept!