Dramatic Affect Over Ultimate Results ???

I don't think so. Why would the alleged perpetraters of the 911 incident not use a tried and proven method of demolition, i.e., explosives? Too many things can go wrong with the jumbo jet plan of demolition, and they got it right on the 1st try, again, I have my doubts for this reason alone.

reply to post by plainmike

If you mean, "of course the towers were brought down with explosives (or something of that nature)", then I think you are absolutely right.

That is one of the tip offs to an inside job. The buildings were designed to take the impacts of the aircraft and the fuel fires weren't hot enough and didn't burn long enough to do the damage ascribed to them.

The planes were part of the scenario because that is a scenario that Americans would easily accept as part of a "terrorist" plot. A building demolition requires insider access.