It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AD5673
In fact, if all the nukes in the world were used strategically to kill as many people as possable (instead of military targets as they would be) about half of the worlds population would survive.
. No! If all the nukes in the world would be used there wouldnt be a world. Scientists say that if 1000 nukes hit one major place the world would split in half, and there is like 20,000 nukes on Earth.
no, more around 3,000 and when was that said? nukes may be powerful but not strong enough to damage the earth's crust even if it hit a major fault line.
Originally posted by namehere
Originally posted by AD5673
In fact, if all the nukes in the world were used strategically to kill as many people as possable (instead of military targets as they would be) about half of the worlds population would survive.
. No! If all the nukes in the world would be used there wouldnt be a world. Scientists say that if 1000 nukes hit one major place the world would split in half, and there is like 20,000 nukes on Earth.
no, more around 3,000 and when was that said? nukes may be powerful but not strong enough to damage the earth's crust even if it hit a major fault line.
but biological i think are the worst invention.
Originally posted by xenophanes85
Intentional violence. No matter how petty.
I think the worst invention in history were nuclear wepons