It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 911filesI would have been there except I had more important things to do.
I am also not a nameless shadow hiding behind a computer keyboard.
The report was 12 people in attendence from a DC area radio station.
Originally posted by Ligon
You're saying that was the only thing stopping you? You didn't have anything more important to do during all of the countless hours (probably hundreds) you spent online in the past couple years trying (and failing) to counter their evidence. [edit on 12-7-2009 by Ligon]
Originally posted by 911files
You have it right. Someone heard it on the radio, passed it to someone else and hence, the rumor.
Originally posted by Ligon
Originally posted by 911files
You have it right. Someone heard it on the radio, passed it to someone else and hence, the rumor.
No, that's not true and that's not what I said. No one claimed to have heard the "8-12 people in attendance" rumor on the radio. It is a rumor started by a JREFer who claims he has a friend who went to the conference.
[edit on 12-7-2009 by Ligon]
Originally posted by tezzajwI'm not surprised that there was no one there to argue with CIT. It's easier for anonymous government story believers to do it from the safety of a keyboard.
Originally posted by 911files
See, now that is what is so bad about rumors, every iteration of it causes it to change a little and drift further from reality. Sort of like eyewitness accounts.
Originally posted by 911filesThere is nothing wrong with the evidence presented by CIT, only the evaluation and 'spin' they choose to put on it (cherry picking).
Originally posted by Ligon
Have you or anyone else gotten a video or audio recorded interview with someone who was in a position to judge the plane's location in relation to the Navy Annex and who places it on the south side?
If so please post them.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by tezzajwI'm not surprised that there was no one there to argue with CIT. It's easier for anonymous government story believers to do it from the safety of a keyboard.
How does this work? I've been asked why I spend so much time on here talking, and now you're saying we should do more.
Which is it and why do you care?
Originally posted by 911files
Not the subject of this thread. The topic is how many folks showed up for their little get together.
The refutation and/or evaluation of their witnesses has been done to death and they are consistent with a large plan hitting the Pentagon.
If it flew a little north or south of the Citgo does not matter to me much
not one of them saw it fly over the Pentagon
and those in a position to see saw it hit the Pentagon.
Prior to impact ALL of them give a different flight path assessment. Perfectly natural.
Originally posted by Ligon
It's also about another more interesting statistic (presented by me in the OP) about the attendence: "Despite "debunkers" like jthomas spending untold hours on the internet ridiculing CIT, NOT A SINGLE DEBUNKER HAD THE COURAGE TO SHOW UP TO THIS EVENT AND CHALLENGE THEIR RESEARCH."
Originally posted by Ligon
2) They are all correct and the relatively small number of witnesses who were in locations from which they may have been able to see the alleged impact spot and who do genuinely believe that they saw the plane hit the building were fooled by a carefully planned deception, executed with military precision..
Originally posted by discombobulator
Originally posted by Ligon
Have you or anyone else gotten a video or audio recorded interview with someone who was in a position to judge the plane's location in relation to the Navy Annex and who places it on the south side?
If so please post them.
No need to, CIT already did the work for us.
When asked to draw a flight path by Craig, Keith Wheelhouse specifically drew a South of Citgo and South of Navy Annex flight path. That is an undeniable fact.
A fact that is conveniantly, and deliberately, overlooked by CIT when they repeat "noone saw the plane" on the "official flight path" over and over and over.
Additionally, in the first interview with Russell Pickering and Craig, Edward Paik put the fuselage of the plane over Columbia Pike (south of Navy Annex) with the right wing taking out the VDOT antenna.
Madelyn Zakhem also puts the plane south of the Navy Annex.
CIT, of course, will ignore all of these witness accounts.