It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bachfin
the cropcircle mentioned 7/7 on 7/7 largest sunspot in recorded history shows up and your trying to dismiss it?? ... wow
Originally posted by Bachfin
...the cropcircle mentioned 7/7 on 7/7 largest sunspot in recorded history shows up and your trying to dismiss it?? ... wow
However, I dont care. I dont care who, how, or even really why these 'cop images' were put there, but I see a pattern, and a relationship. How can anyone deny that?... The ignorant i guess...But I digress.
The bottom line is the SOLAR ACTIVITY at the moment, and thats an important thing to focus on, not the tired old shills slapping their keyboards with derision and distraction.
Originally posted by Overbyte77
Originally posted in another thread:
I don't get why people were expecting a huge (doomsday?) event and are now either disappointed or feel vindicated for saying "I told you so".
The very fact that this solar minimum ended right when a few crop formations said it would is enough to change my perception of them entirely. I feel the 'evidence' from the formations, such as the egg shaped 'earth' and the possible jellyfish/magnetosphere correlation, are the researchers' opinion. They may have simply been made to indicate "flare/sunspots" rather than "run for the hills" which all this hysteria and speculation has also fueled. We seem primed these days to expect the worst.
Granted, I've also watched a few videos that have helped to convince me these formations may be more than simply a group(s) of highly dedicated and talented individuals with alot of time on their hands. Nassim Haramein's 45 part youtube lecture, to name one, provided some good evidence of this.
So this begs the question....what is with this flare? Other than it being the end of the minimum, why would ETs bother telling us about a (so far) benign event? No one knows of course, but I have my theories.
-O
Sunspot 1024 is relatively large, but it does not have the kind of complex magnetic field that poses a threat for major eruptions. Crop circles, it turns out, are not a useful tool for forecasting solar activity.
The very fact that this solar minimum ended right when a few crop formations said it would...
Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by Trunkeight
However, I dont care. I dont care who, how, or even really why these 'cop images' were put there, but I see a pattern, and a relationship. How can anyone deny that?... The ignorant i guess...But I digress.
The bottom line is the SOLAR ACTIVITY at the moment, and thats an important thing to focus on, not the tired old shills slapping their keyboards with derision and distraction.
The only pattern I see is that they never have and never will prove anything unless it is just dumb luck that something would occur that someone predicted from interpreting a crop circle.
You might as well divine info from the tea leaves after you drink a cup of tea. It will be just as relevent to reality.
Originally posted by fleabit
reply to post by lpowell0627
And the "language" one, I did look at it. It's gibberish.
It means nothing. You act as if normal joes with rope and planks are also incredibly stupid, unable to look up ancient languages or runes or anything else, to use in their designs. If I wanted to bamboozle everyone and make them spend countless fruitless hours trying to decipher something I made, that's exactly how I would do it.
And finally, I seriously doubt an intelligent species or even a terran source, would go to that effort to just say "ha ha I'm smarter than all of you cuz I know when sunspots will appear!"
Originally posted by Overbyte77
reply to post by Elepheagle
No, I did not read many posts in this thread because I was only voicing my opinion irrespective of anyone else's in particular.
The fact is that crop formations indicated an event that would occur within a very small window, days and weeks in advance....and lo and behold an event has occured that very closely resembled the researcher(s) analysis and conclusions. Coincidence? Maybe, if one believes in coincidence.
The details arent a perfect match to the analysis presented (so far) but i don't think anyone can deny the significance of this small event in itself.
-O