It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree on most things you've said. I too,as of late,am growing really worried about Unity_99 and a touch of pananoia isn't off the table either. I would say to her to take it easy,relax and try to take infromation with more calm,not get so agitated about it all. The word conjecture is used by many in many cases.Has ntohing to do with fbi etc.
Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by Unity_99
I kept asking the one I was writing to…what is so dangerous about a free mind? Why is there so much control and such a need to put certain seeds in…he was trying to fob off pseudo ufology on me along…and using words…as a friend who was discussing conspiracies…with a very analytical methodology. The word that made me confront the issue head on was, when he said, that was merely conjecture and I said only fbi types would use that term.
That single word made you believe that he was FBI?
Unity_99, with all due respect, anyone can use the word “conjecture” when it comes to the discussion of Ufology, as there is no solid, irrefutable proof as to what Ufos are.
That is a fact.
Up until there is real, examinable verification, the word conjecture is perfectly applicable to the subject. And it doesn’t make anyone a government agent to use it.
I hate to say this, but you admitting to this makes you sound terribly paranoid and that isn’t helping your cause at all.
And as to your saying he used psuedo-ufology; how do you quantify that? What makes you so sure his opinion or approach used pretence? (I consider ET_MAN’s approach to the subject hugely artificial, not to mention imaginary, and I can guarantee that many others will feel the same, but that does not mean that we are all - or any of us - on the “Dark Side”.)
If your answer is that you read his “energy” then I am at a loss as to know what to say to you.
Why? Because your saying you can gauge a persons intent by their “energy” is – I’m afraid – conjectural at best, inadmissible at worst, and the most disturbing thing is you don’t see that.
I am not a nasty person or a serial, hard-nosed skeptic, despite what anyone may think, and even though this may be over stepping the bounds of this thread, I have to say that I am worried about you.
Take that how you will, but it’s the truth.
Share it with us then, if you won't share it with him. You post on this thread non-stop anyway,so might as well answer these questions and share with us who are still here,most of whom await october 11 and what happens to this thread thereafter.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Beamish
One thing I won't share with him is the energy bouncing off him, because I read energy and placed a certain energy, so a certain group, world wide apparently.
you keep saying ''you'' then "him". This sentence especially is weird> "You wouldnt let up and kept pushing in a negative way, ideas at me that I reject and will never accept, and was very aggressive at doing so'' - started out as YOU and ended up as "WAS very agressive,as in HIM" So within the same sentence chaging ''you'' to ''him'' in one trai nof thought seems to imply something.
Note to him: you asked how I knew, for your assessment report, I gather, lol.
You wouldnt let up and kept pushing in a negative way, ideas at me that I reject and will never accept, and was very aggressive at doing so. So the flaw would be thoroughly annoying someone and getting their backbone up enough to bring up what they thought. Aggressive persistance to push agenda
when one contemplates what you have said here...and looks back at many posts by Unity...one realzies that there is much truth in what you speak Leo Virgo. I thank you for your view of it.I share it in many layers.Unknowingly, by saying to not be fooled,to discern for themselves,and then going further and saying the way I THINK is the ONLY TRUE WAY..makes it all hypocrycy,changing boxes. You sitll have no freedom to chooce for yourself, only what she says can be the right TRUE way.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Unity_99
You say you dont like control...but yet you also refuses to support others thinking for themselves if it disagrees with what you understand. You say to others to come out of the box....but yet you set another trap for them in the end
No, and he isn't FBI, that is US.
That one word frustrated me enough to just bring up what I was suspecting for some time. I'd had enough. And the rest of the conversation is no one's business. Oh and after he was writing again, and I was "wandering off topic" in his mind, being told to get back on assignment really put my nose out of joint. I was like And then the idea came, hmmmm... is there a check coming in the mail then?
He's only one, the list of what I supsect is a lot bigger. Control is the thing I note the most. And put downs.
No one is ever going to control me.
Originally posted by chloe4412
KABLOWIE!!!!!! LOL!!!!
And the 2012 stuff is Mountain Oysters too!!!
I will believe none of it any longer.
Two years, Really? He must be laughing his head off by now seeing what he's created. These people are pure paranoid Scitzo's, some of you, not all. Some on here knew it all along and kudos to ya.
People who want to show their a@@ take their pants down and let's all look is what I say. Rock on...
I'm done now. Have fun in Doomland folks.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I wonder what people would have to be afraid of if there wasn't You tube
So many nut jobs get a idea in their head and feel the need to broadcast it to the world.
just look at the percentages of the many whom have made prediction vids and have failed.
I could use the girl (narnia) that stated Elenin was the earthquake generator..nothing has come from
that one. people that had made predictions that Rome was gonna be destroyed a month ago or so,.
that didnt happen either..
the Point here is, Use You tube for cooking ideas or gardening tips instead of believing someones
off the wall preachings.. as it has proven time and time again to be wrong.
Yes
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I wonder what people would have to be afraid of if there wasn't You tube
So many nut jobs get a idea in their head and feel the need to broadcast it to the world.
just look at the percentages of the many whom have made prediction vids and have failed.
I could use the girl (narnia) that stated Elenin was the earthquake generator..nothing has come from
that one. people that had made predictions that Rome was gonna be destroyed a month ago or so,.
that didnt happen either..
the Point here is, Use You tube for cooking ideas or gardening tips instead of believing someones
off the wall preachings.. as it has proven time and time again to be wrong.
I completely agree with you, I never watch youtube links id rather see a transcript, unfortunatly this means that ive missed about 50% of the content of Unitys threads (no offence).
Your right, its not a reliable source for the topics that we discuss here.
Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by followtheevidence
Who are you asking?
If you're asking ET_MAN, then you are wasting your time as he has left the thread.
Originally posted by redgy
for anyone who may hold the answer,
if infinity does exist, why would a loving higher power send a soul to eternal damnation for the wrongs commited in this miniscule point of life we now experience, is there no time, where there is no time for a soul in finding this requirement of love and righteousness for a chance at life in everlasting heaven.
peace.