It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by angelbelle
Question for ET_
After physical death is the light at the end of the tunnel a trap?
Originally posted by tamusan
reply to post by U-N-I-T-Y
I think there are three basic types of people, no matter their beliefs:
1. Those who want to take from everyone to improve their situation
2. Those who will freely give what they do not need.
3. Those who will give anything
Originally posted by gallifreyan medic
reply to post by U-N-I-T-Y
we all have different paths we must cross but at the end of the day it should all be the same goal...to become ONE...we will take different paths to get there
You cannot unite one.
That is why we are individual.
Originally posted by Laurauk
ET-Dude!
I have come to the conclusion that you are either a complete hoax or a false prophet. Trying to pursway people away from god.
I for one do not believe what you have posted on this thread.
We have been warned to look out for false prophets such as yourself. Or are you the antichrist or the beast.
Either way when judgement day comes, you will not be one of themany chosen.
I cannot believe I just sat in front off my pc for 3 hours reading all these postings from ET. Shame on you.
[edit on 28-6-2009 by Laurauk]
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to post by badmedia
so if I were trying to get points I should 1.create a thread I could never provide proof for.2.be vague and coy about the "info"I have.3.tell people I will tell them more later.4.answer any unprovable questions IE:how many will die? billions.5 .let the zealots imagination run wild.=solid content contribution?..........edit for punctuation
WHAT OBJECT? please be specific such as type of object, mass, density, makeup, etc..
Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
Originally posted by U-N-I-T-Y
Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
reply to post by U-N-I-T-Y
You are correct, sir. Each of us holds and owns a different truth. Shouldnt we all strive for a truth that is good for all?
absolutely...but it will be hard for us to do because everyone has different beliefs
It should not be so hard, we all believe in a goodness, a desire for happiness and fulfillment for all mankind and creatures.
If all of us were together on a deserted island, Im sure each would have their different desires, some would like to soak up the sun, some would swim, some would fish. Some would panic. But the desire to survive would be the truth that brought us all together.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by genius/idoit
I have a question about the poster of this thread so it may be off topic but it goes to credibility.how could some one who has posted one thread and joined less than 1 month ago be considered a solid contributor?all he said was he was told bad things are going to happen but I can't tell you what or when. that's solid contribution?I use these indicators as an insight into a poster who perhaps I'm not familiar with. maybe I don't understand how these things work?no offense meant to ET man
He probably got it all off this thread alone. The contribution system is a joke and an insult to members. As you can see, all you need to do is create some out there thread that plays towards peoples biases, and you too can be a "solid contributor".
When this thread first appeared, his bar was completely gray, now it's got a good bit of blue in it.
They should add [HOAX] to the end of the contribution images, would probably be more accurate than it does identifying true quality posters.
Some people do make quality threads, and sadly they don't get near the flags as things like this do.
Personally, it makes me like this site a good bit less and I consider it to be an insult, but I deal with it and move on.
[edit on 6/28/2009 by badmedia]
that is a fair assessment but what draws you to that conclusion?
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to post by badmedia
so if I were trying to get points I should 1.create a thread I could never provide proof for.2.be vague and coy about the "info"I have.3.tell people I will tell them more later.4.answer any unprovable questions IE:how many will die? billions.5 .let the zealots imagination run wild.=solid content contribution?..........edit for punctuation
Yes basically. It's not really based on the quality of what you post, it's all about playing towards peoples biases. If you play towards the biases people already have, then you get flagged up. If you don't, then you are ignored.