Warnings From The Benevolents!

reply to post by win 52


What 200 Year. The discussion is about 200 million years.

proving wrong thinking in all fields of science

What does this fallacious claim have to do with anything?

reply to post by stereologist


Strange thing is, I have always had a big interest taking up Geology and I have covered Physic's in Engineering, though yes I have only picked at one aspect of my debate and was typically aware of that.

I'm still learning interesting fact's from you also that's worth reading up on.

[edit on 30-8-2010 by DClairvoyant]

To change the world, you must first become the world.

The Tao of Self

By, Onequestion

reply to post by DClairvoyant


The cool part of an introduction to geology is that a lot of what is said seems rather obvious. For example, a review of landforms seems rather obvious. The reason this is done is to put it in print. I know that sounds weird, but really at some point you have to state the obvious. What I began to realize after a bit was that the obvious was only obvious after it had been stated. Then you learn that the shape of the hills and other land forms is due in part to the structures under the surface and the forces that acted on them.

The reason I mentioned physics is that the use of physics terms should not be overlooked. There really isn't much math to do, but an understanding of physics principals, which you have, makes it a more interesting read.

A book on plate tectonics is also fascinating since this idea is new. It really took hold in the 1960s when maps of the ocean became good. Before then 70% of the geology of the Earth was unknown. Pretty hard to do a good job in describing the history of the Earth when the majority is a big question mark.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by win 52

 

What 200 Year. The discussion is about 200 million years.

proving wrong thinking in all fields of science

What does this fallacious claim have to do with anything?

Remember that absolute dating methods have really come into being since the discovery of radioactivity by Bequerel in 1896 I believe. For an interesting read check out the Time Machine. It was written by Wells in 1895. The book has the time traveler going to the ends of time, which back then was estimated to be 30My in the future. The understanding of nuclear processes that was to come shortly changed the estimate by showing there was a power source greater than chemical activity.

I believe there is a much more accurate dating system available today. Science refuses to use it because that would create too many holes in our current version of History, that they would not be able to deny. Much like you do constantly.

reply to post by win 52


Let's not beat around the bush. Out with it. Let's hear about this dating technique. You do know that there are a multitude of dating methods available. I'd like to hear about the one you have made a vague reference to.

reply to post by win 52


How can you date something that which does not exist. Humm Dee Dumm

Originally posted by Whine Flu
Oh great, so the world ends an exact week prior to my birthday during 2011.

Well, that sucks. I guess apocalypse is an early present, then.

One week, for me its the next day!!! I'm 19 then pooof, gone. Thats life.

Regards, Naeem.

reply to post by onequestion


I never date things.

If you are talking about the way the brain operates when we experience time, then I agree. After all, history is merely illusion as much as me sitting here writing this and even Stereo, you and I are constructs of illusion. It is all a dream, it seems.

Dare to dream and change the world?

Hellooooo . . . where did everybody go?????

Are we finished here . . . or does anyone know if ET_MAN will be coming back?

I've been checking the thread regularly, but have I missed something?

I've been enjoying this thread & looking forward to hearing what he still had to say on a few things he said he'd get back to later on in the thread.

I hope he's ok & hasn't left without saying good-bye.

I think we have to wait until July/2011 if something will really occur ?

I believe there is a much more accurate dating system available today. Science refuses to use it because that would create too many holes in our current version of History, that they would not be able to deny.

I never date things.

If you are talking about the way the brain operates when we experience time, then I agree. After all, history is merely illusion as much as me sitting here writing this and even Stereo, you and I are constructs of illusion.

So Win 52 when you made the first claim and then refused to answer I take it that you lied about the existence of a dating method. It certainly seems that you are trying to weasel out of your dating claim.

From my perspective it appears that you have posted a long winded cock and bull story in this thread. This is not the first time you have fabricated claims in this thread. The sum of these false claims stains all of your statements.

Please show me wrong by revealing this "much more accurate dating system"

Does Greer know he has competition?

Did you check your information with the MoonOnians?

Jeepers Creepers ya know what you will bump into meandering

around.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/87e79e67c783.gif[/atsimg]

Et_man:
One of the many issues I've become curious about is: does the brown drawf orbit within the Oort cloud's enclosure; or, does it somehow orbit in and out of the Oort cloud itself?
Just curious.

reply to post by keops

I hope we still keep the thread going, even while ET_MAN is away.

Might not be able to if we wait til something happens.


PS: KIZZZY...the MoonOnians are on a trip to Saturn & Jupiter to check out the progress there.

Well he's been very busy. He made this post yesterday, covering so much of the material and touching on his experiences, its very long and very thorough, and very good.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Connects with his metaphsyics here.

part 1 of 13 OLD WORLD SECRETS THE OMEGA PROJECT CODES

These videos seem very interesting. i think a part of what certain factions belive somewhat is being displayed in this, hence the threats given to the author.

reply to post by Unity_99


Thanx, Unity_99,

I haven't been keeping up with ET_MAN's other threads,

so I didn't realise that he IS still around,

and ok . . . glad to hear it!

I have seen something and you'll just have to take my word for it. There is something just around the corner for all of us. I'm currently using PaintArt on Microsoft to draw the codes I was shown. Whether this will be of any use to anybody here, let me know, especially if anybody can translate Symbol's/Codes and possibly Latin text?

reply to post by Maiden PEI


He's keeping his difficulties to himself, but I know he's been very busy,and family matters, so he has hardly been online, just every few days he checks on whats happening. But he was on the other thread a bit, then busy again for days. If that helps.