It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The term "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" or UAP is an attempt to address the fact that not all UAP are described as UFO. Many are simply described as unusual lights. NARCAP feels the term "UAP" more accurately reflects the broad scope of descriptions in aviation reports as well as the possibility that these unusual phenomena may arise from several different sources.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Xtraeme
We're thinking along the same lines then, I knew I had a good reason for adding you to my friends list, I didn't take any offense at your remarks and hope you didn't at mine either.
So, I tend to agree with NARCAP. However I accept your definition and usage of the term "UFO" not because it's better, it's not, but because it's a legacy term that we're stuck with. If we could erase the past and create a new term from scratch, I think I'd have to go with UAP.
On the RB-47 case, thanks for clarifying you're not sure it's alien either. I don't know what happened there, but it's definitely got a high level of strangeness.
The analogy with dark matter is disingenuous, there is overwhelming scientific evidence about huge gravitational effects that are not explained yet.
I'd bet the best way to open true conversation about this subject is if believers started to cull the herd a bit. There are so many "crazies" that the message gets lost amount their illogical shouting.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by Xtraeme
the problem for transient phenomenon is you cant repeat the same incident over & over like you can with exoplanet evidence.
why arn't ufologists raising money to conduct such experiments that you think they should be doing. Just like seti do instead of making money selling books & dvds?
ufo community needs to look at themselves instead of whining at everyone else.
Originally posted by Edrick
reply to post by nablator
The analogy with dark matter is disingenuous, there is overwhelming scientific evidence about huge gravitational effects that are not explained yet.
So... Our Theoretical framework for gravity is not producing models that accurately reflect the observable universe...
So, it must be Dark Matter.
Einstein did this with his early work on relativity, where he added a "Cosmological Constant" to make his False equation True.
So.... "Dark Matter" is science's way of saying "Where is that pesky Higgs Boson?"
We still don't know what causes gravity... I think that this should be a dead giveaway as to the "Authenticity" of this "Dark" "Matter"
And don't even get me started on dark energy.
-Edrick
I have a question for you, if you dont mind to answer (please, feel free not to):
- What made you come out of the dark into ATS?
Or, put on other terms, why did you choose this subject - UFO´s (whatever the definition you choose to approach this subject).
Thanks in advance.