It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jagdflieger
Interesting question. Depending on your view point the Daniel 9 prophecy can be used to support both the dates of 31CE and 33CE (See BIBLICAL PROPHECY - DANIEL'S 70 WEEKS.) However, I tend to lean to the date of 31CE (or AD) since it seems to line up with Daniel 9 better than 33CE and it is hard to explain how being buried on Friday and being risen on Sunday is three days. Therefore the date of 31CE seems to fit the events laid out in the Gospels better. However I feel that whether you believe it was 31CE or 33CE, the really important point was that Christ was crucified and on a Sunday His tomb was empty because Jesus Christ had rising bringing to end the power that sin had over us.
Put Christ back into Passover. That's the point of this thread. That's the point of the year of His birth. It disproves the "Good Friday/Easter Sunday" tradition. It gives hard facts about the actual day of His crucifixion and makes more sense with the 3 days/3 nights scenario. That is my point... plain and simple. THE TRUTH!
The problem is that the Catholic bishops adopted the equinoxes and solstices of the pagan celebrations, kept the traditions of the pagan festivals and just changed pagan god worship into christian God worship.
Originally posted by jagdflieger
reply to post by Locoman8
The problem is that the Catholic bishops adopted the equinoxes and solstices of the pagan celebrations, kept the traditions of the pagan festivals and just changed pagan god worship into christian God worship.
I don't think that we are that far apart in view point about this matter. I tried to make the point that no matter what day is picked, it is the people's actions which turn that day into a pagan holiday. For example the Easter Bunny who is supposed to deliver all kinds of goodies to your children (all of which were purchased from the candy companies). What does a rabbit have to do with the resurrection of Christ? - Well nothing. To paraphrase another saying "Dates don't make pagan holidays; people make pagan holidays". Yes a lot of that started when the bishops adopted the equinoxes and solstices as the day for Christian remembrance. They probably did that to reduce the computational load of determining the day. That was not the problem, the problem occurred when they adopted pagan symbols and rituals. My point, the people can turn any given day into a pagan holiday; the people can turn any given day into a holy day.
I've seen many accounts of historians and scholars putting Christ's birth at 4 AD, so then His death and resurrection would have been in 37 AD.
Originally posted by Locoman8
reply to post by Blue_Jay33
Why do you agree with 33AD? Because of "good friday?" It's important to discuss the truth behind what happened and when because it reveals the truth behind "good friday" and "easter sunday", two false events.