It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benoni
Swamp...
You referred to an explosion as being the reason for the, as you put it, itsy bitsy piece of chip being found over a mile away...
Would that be the explosion the plane felt as it was impacted by the ground or the air to air missile...??
You are correct, my knowledge of explosives is fairly limited...but common sense and logic i have in abundance...and there is no repeat no evidence of your alleged "explosion" which you imply took place upon impact with the ground...
None.
So your argument makes no logical sense....
And thank you for your concerns re. my finances...
[edit on 27-6-2009 by benoni]
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Once again, you do not pay attention. Titorite was talking about the plane being completely buried. I was pointing out that the crater was too shallow for the plane to have completely buried itself.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
In addition, in another post I stated that a large part of Flight 93 was recovered from the crater and that the remaining part was scattered to hell and back by the explosion.
Yet Reheat stated that the bulk of the plane was buried. Your contradiction with an official story believer is noted.
Right, so we've narrowed it down to two neat parts. Ok. What length was the part that was buried under the ground? What length was the part that wasn't buried under the ground?
I'm trying to ask really simple questions now, so you won't be confused with your replies.
Originally posted by trebor451What Squadron? Simply stating what "squadron" you are assigned to is harmless.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Lets see, I think they pieced enough together to know that 59 feet 7 and 3/4 inches was in the crater....which leaves 95 feet 6 inches outside the crater.
I dont know the length of the plane that was left in the crater, no one does, the wreckage was too fragmented for such measurements.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by tezzajw
Adds "inability to understand sarcasm" to reading comprehension issues.
Originally posted by P1DrummerBoy
Originally posted by trebor451What Squadron? Simply stating what "squadron" you are assigned to is harmless.
Who are you?
Are you swampfox's secretary? Bring me some coffee.
The Squadron at which I am stationed is of zero importance. Also, no, it is not 'harmless' for me to give out information pertaining to my orders. That was one of the most unintelligent questions I've ever been asked.
Please don't waste my time with incompetence.
Originally posted by tezzajw
There's lots of us reading this thread who want an explanation for how the bulk of the plane was found buried in that crater.
Originally posted by trebor451
Easy. F=ma
Force= amount of force gravity applied to the aircraft at impact (g)
mass= made up of all the aircraft parts together (i.e. not necessarily a/c weight)
acceleration = aircraft speed (can be zero or a constant number, the latter meaning there is no acceleration but this factor would apply towards the amount of force as a component of how fast the mass was moving and how that contributed to the amount of g present at impact.
Originally posted by trebor451
If you can plug in the numbers and come up with a force
Originally posted by trebor451
that will suggest the aircraft should not have been in the condition it was in at Shanksville after impact, you win.
Originally posted by trebor451
No whining, no backpedaling, no complaints about not addressing the OP, no lateral moves to avoid doing the math.
You asked a specific question and I answered it for you. Do move on, please?