It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Couldnt have been that a building would be a little more resistant to fuel vapor than a stand of trees.....naw, that couldnt be it.
Don't use diversion here - no-one is actually talking about the trees. We're talking about the point of impact/explosion (the same as what happened when Pan Am wings hit the ground), creating a fireball the same as at the Pentagon (because it was the same fuel, remember)
Because Val McClatchy's photo shows a smoke cloud with a tail, indicating one initial point of explosion, not a burning mass stretched over 150 feet. You say you were in the military - you'd be able to spot that.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
And you really cannot make a valid comparision between the three. Differing speeds, differing impact angles and different materials being struck.
Ever watched an FAE bomb go off?
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
And you really cannot make a valid comparision between the three. Differing speeds, differing impact angles and different materials being struck.
Ever watched an FAE bomb go off?
Originally posted by impressme
What do you expect the truth movement to do? They are already labeled low level terrorist by the criminals in Washington.
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
reply to post by Rewey
We are almost eight years past the event.
You have a right to your opinion, no matter what it may be; make no mistake about that. My personal belief is you (the royal you) treat your accusations as something of an entertainment outlet and no, you're not going to get off your ass and actually do something.
I'll check back in a year.
You guys have been doing it all the way through this thread! "Look at this plane crash example, look at that plane example"... please...
Can we officially use your quote in every 9/11 thread to wave off any and all accounts of OS supporters using other plane crashes to prove points, because "...you really cannot make a valid comparison between the three. Differing speeds, differing impact angles and different materials being struck...?
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Contrast the protesters in Iran who are literally being killed for their beliefs, protesting in the streets versus the so-called 'truth movement'. They clearly possess the convictions of their beliefs.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Contrast the protesters in Iran who are literally being killed for their beliefs, protesting in the streets versus the so-called 'truth movement'. They clearly possess the convictions of their beliefs.
Excellent point. Again, excellent point. I've asked this of the Troothers before - if they had the power of their own convictions and beliefs. To put it succinctly, no.
Originally posted by Rewey
Hate to point this out to you, but have a look at how long the 'truth' about the US involvement in other wars has taken to come out? Before it's FINALLY admitted as truth. Decades.