It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ABSTRACT. This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Picollo30
You are one of the ones that have awaken.
Somethings up.
I don't profess the ins and outs of what that something is but something is amiss.
It only took me 50+ years to figure out all is not right with what we perceive as "reality".
Welcome to the Matrix.
Originally posted by Darth Logan
reply to post by JScytale
Not even close, if we evolved from apes they would cease to exsist. But a a hybrid could if someone manipulated there DNA.
Originally posted by JScytale
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Picollo30
You are one of the ones that have awaken.
Somethings up.
I don't profess the ins and outs of what that something is but something is amiss.
It only took me 50+ years to figure out all is not right with what we perceive as "reality".
Welcome to the Matrix.
its an entertaining thought, but consider how vast the universe is. if it were somehow true, i sure want to know the specs on the computer running "the universe"!
considering there have been no events in recorded history that suggest such a thing, such as a "glitch", its extraordinarily unlikely. Not to mention, if we were, why would they bother giving every human being an inner experience as opposed to simply modeling behavior? both achieve the same results, one takes far, far, far less effort.
Originally posted by JScytale
Originally posted by Darth Logan
reply to post by JScytale
Not even close, if we evolved from apes they would cease to exsist. But a a hybrid could if someone manipulated there DNA.
first off, that's because we didn't evolve from the apes and instead share a common ancestor.
second off, no they wouldn't cease to exist - there are plenty of genetic offshoots from parent populations. take islands for example. once a species is on an island for long enough and reaches the point where it can no longer mate with its mainland counterparts after adapting to the new environment, its a new species - but the old one is doing just fine on the mainland.
And that common ancestor is.............. what? And you just said it was'nt apes. I was just curious to know what it is.
Have you ever looked closely at ourselves, and of the animals and made the connection to our environment and how evolution shaped us? We are perfectly suited to live on earth. No we don't have furry coats to protect from the cold, we are not as element hardy as the animals, we don't have sharp claws to protect ourselves with either, but we have one thing they don't. And that is extra mental capacity.
Our brains allow us to cover ourselves when we are cold, allow us to fashion weapons to be used like claws, but better. Our brains are our evolutionary advantage. And we did not come from the animal kingdom. That is my OP.