The ID on "Operation Blackjack" has a secret message

Originally posted by MOFreemason
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR ATS USERS!!!!!!
CAN WE ALL AGREE THIS IS A HOAX NOW???

No, because jackblack14.info just popped up out of nowhere. jackblack12.info is the only site mentioned on the Telegraph.

reply to post by 2008111

I wonder if a new website will appear and you will wonder if that one is real, look at 12 not 13 not 14 not bloody 16000 - plus anyway the guy who made it has said its not real how much more proof do you need

and 2008111 yes i am a member of ats

it is a real game ? or a game in disguise, imagine that you provide the answers and guidance, there is one who gives information and other one watching forum and read and you made the work all by decoding what they give you to decode and give them information when you finish they give you another one and they had creat fictious site with wrong code to drive some people on the wrong way,
it's really a very smart plan, because if this is really true, the survey could be very very very long ,view that there is thousands of people involved, and those who mounted the operation are quite safe there are hidden they dont have to talk just to read how they can find him?you have solved the coded number and images, you're guilty for helping terrorists.
what make me nervous it is more time we take to solve the code more time they have to do what they should do
and more time we ask if it's a game a test or whatever and more time we dont look in the right place
yes it's a game but how this game end?

The creator of the site forgot one important thing: HIS website wasn't mentioned in the London Telegraph.

Anyone notice the change on www.jackblack13.info...
"This page is a distraction, decode objective from here, regular order, process elevated."

Oh and part 5 of blackjack on the telegraph got changed to "The events depicted here are imaginary and fictional"

Funnies

Believing that Ms Spears can sing is a conspiracy in itself lol. Maybe she could when she was a Mouseketeer.

Originally posted by Whyhi
Anyone notice the change on www.jackblack13.info...
"This page is a distraction, decode objective from here, regular order, process elevated."

Oh and part 5 of blackjack on the telegraph got changed to "The events depicted here are imaginary and fictional"

Funnies

And that 47 page has a google link that searches for "all have sinned"



Did you happen to notice that?

So when are the black vehicles going to come asking questions?

Originally posted by Whyhi
Anyone notice the change on www.jackblack13.info...
"This page is a distraction, decode objective from here, regular order, process elevated."

Oh and part 5 of blackjack on the telegraph got changed to "The events depicted here are imaginary and fictional"

Funnies

In Part 5, there is no "imaginary and fictional" disclaimer underneath the slide that has the national ID card and the code.

Accident? Purposeful?

reply to post by C0ntract0r


Remember, blackjacks 13 and 14 are fake; blackjack12.info is the only side mentioned in the slideshow.

reply to post by Totakeke


Right along that same line of thinking, I meant for the guy who made jb13. I wouldn't want to be him.

reply to post by C0ntract0r


Ah, understood.

Originally posted by wdream
reply to post by StaringBack

 

You are from Colorado and not from England. If you were in London I would think you are a friend of Justin Williams.
Now that was political...

Why? Because I like to give counter arguments? And look at this from a different angle than "OMG it's all for realz the super secret binary code said so!"?

reply to post by StaringBack


Or maybe, "There's a hexadecimal code in a slideshow on the website for a major newspaper. We should investigate this further and see what's going on." Is it a crime to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? You do know that you're on a conspiracy website, right?

[edit on 20-6-2009 by Totakeke]

reply to post by StaringBack


Nothing wrong with giving the skeptic side of things, but saying it's fake just because you don't think conspiracy's are real isn't exactly a good arguement

Originally posted by Totakeke
reply to post by StaringBack

 

Or maybe, "There's a hexadecimal code in a slideshow on the website for a major newspaper. We should investigate this further and see what's going on." Is it a crime to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? You do know that you're on a conspiracy website, right?

[edit on 20-6-2009 by Totakeke]

Of course, I have fun with it too! I just don't like being told that I am thought to be friends with JW for trying to be open minded about the situation.

Originally posted by StaringBack

Originally posted by Totakeke
reply to post by StaringBack

 

Or maybe, "There's a hexadecimal code in a slideshow on the website for a major newspaper. We should investigate this further and see what's going on." Is it a crime to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? You do know that you're on a conspiracy website, right?

[edit on 20-6-2009 by Totakeke]

Of course, I have fun with it too! I just don't like being told that I am thought to be friends with JW for trying to be open minded about the situation.

Well, I never said that.

Originally posted by Whyhi
reply to post by StaringBack

 

Nothing wrong with giving the skeptic side of things, but saying it's fake just because you don't think conspiracy's are real isn't exactly a good arguement

Wow, you totally just assumed things about me when you don't know what you're talking about.

I'm giving the skeptics side of things on THIS particular topic.

When did I say conspiracy's aren't real? Never once, you're putting words in my mouth.

I believe in a lot of conspiracies, just not this one. Sorry.

reply to post by StaringBack

No, sorry. But I feel that you are knowingly ignoring the motivation behind the theory of the believers.
Think with the head of somebody who saw all the youtube videos about the 2001 attacks. Why would it be so far fetched that somebody made a comic about something that will happen/planned. Just to discredit anybody who leaks information to the public. And after the predicted "events" they (the entity behind all of this) could sacrifice the creator. Nobody would believe a terrorist: "somebody told me to make these comics"

Originally posted by wdream
reply to post by StaringBack

 

No, sorry. But I feel that you are knowingly ignoring the motivation behind the theory of the believers.
Think with the head of somebody who saw all the youtube videos about the 2001 attacks. Why would it be so far fetched that somebody made a comic about something that will happen/planned. Just to discredit anybody who leaks information to the public. And after the predicted "events" they (the entity behind all of this) could sacrifice the creator. Nobody would believe a terrorist: "somebody told me to make these comics"

Ignoring the motivation? If you look back you'll see that I was a believer of this. I know the motivation.

I've come to different conclusions now than I had yesterday. Especially considering all of the links to Justin Williams that other members here have pointed out.

reply to post by StaringBack


and were are just supposed to follow you?

2nd lineeeeeeee