It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Plot Summary: The as-yet-untitled film will explore the root causes of the global economic meltdown and take a comical look at the corporate and political shenanigans that culminated in what Moore has described as "the biggest robbery in the history of this country" – the massive transfer of U.S. taxpayer money to private financial institutions.
Originally posted by DazE777
Well I guess it was only a matter of time, but Michael Moore has a new movie coming out this October on....wait for it.....the economy.
I personally am a fan of his. Some say he is very one-sided in his ranting. But the information he does present, in my mind anyway, is still pretty compelling.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
His previous films have been debunked to hell and back, why would anyone put any credence in a new one?
Originally posted by intrepid
I haven't seen Sicko. I might see this one. I might not.
I'm sure the barbs will flow fast and furious against him here though.
Larry Stecco v Michael Moore.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by jjkenobi
His previous films have been debunked to hell and back, why would anyone put any credence in a new one?
But they haven't...show me the successful lawsuits against him.
Originally posted by Republican08
I smell hypocrisy and double chins,
Originally posted by DazE777
reply to post by blupblup
Ya...thanks
I didn't think it would work. Perhaps someone could enlighten me.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Larry Stecco v Michael Moore.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by jjkenobi
His previous films have been debunked to hell and back, why would anyone put any credence in a new one?
But they haven't...show me the successful lawsuits against him.
Next?
This is the only movie where there has been a successful lawsuit against Michael Moore - filed by former friend Larry Stecco who successfully argued that his portrayal in the movie was not an accurate reflection of his character ("False light invasion of privacy" is the legal term) and won. Stecco was interviewed attending a society fund raising ball and was made out to be a high-society rich pig who partied while people where starving outside. He was actually a lawyer who worked pro-bono for the poorer residents of Flint.