Bidens WARNING of Major Crisis within 6 months will be US nuking North Korea.

I believe we are about to witness a pre-emtive strike by the US on North Korea using their recent misbehaviour as the excuse. The strike will be catastrophic, and unparalleled in earths history, as Obama will want to get it right straight away without having to commit troops from an already over streched US millitary.

The world will be in awe of Obama, and ask 'who can make war with this man'?

Welcome to King Obamas New World Order.

Heres a link to a recent article:

North Korea in 'early phase of all-out confrontation with US'

Sigh....obviously no one has learnt a thing from the past. A nuclear strike solves nothing. Nobody wins a nuclear war. If the US thinks North Korea would not strike back, they are kidding.

The US have nuclear weapons. How are they any different?? Just because the US isn't testing them??? Pfffttt. The world needs to rid itself of every single one. Unfortunatley - each country needs to do this themselves. The US is NOT the world police and they can NOT make other countries disarm when they themselves do not.

I read that nuclear missiles now are 40x that of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki nukes dropped. I could be wrong but if I'm correct, I can't really imagine the devastation that would be caused.

Hope this doesn't happen

The US will not launch a nuclear strike against North Korea. Can we stop with all the fear mongering nonsense? If there is a confrontation with NK it will be a conventional one. In fact, the US is not likely to launch a preemptive strike of any kind against the North Koreans.

The only way this situation turns into an armed conflict is if North Korea moves on South Korea and even if that happens, nukes will not be involved.

We aren't going to nuke NK. That would be suicide on our part. SK would have to deal with the fall out. Also China.

A preemptive nuclear strike is not going to happen.

The US wouldn't do this for two reasons:

Russia and China..

Both have borders with NK, both have nukes as well.

I honestly just do not get Kim. What is he after? From NK's perspective what good can come of this? He is the one who has created his enemies, namely China and Russia. They probably aren't enemies but they appear to be against him on this. Has he become so paranoid about the US attacking him that he doesn't use sense?

I would strike with bunker busters.

My first target would be on top of the crazy Kim's head.

Also this would be a perfect chance to use new weapons other than nuclear.

Little Kimmy is out of his mind.

Pfff why North Korea? Let Japan and China handle that mess.

Iran seems like a more likely target.

I can't see us making any strike against the North Koreans right now especially since things are destabilizing in Iran which is their ally, but there is no way we can pull it off without China's support and they have already declared publicly that will not happen. If we struck even conventionally we would risk massive retaliation from China, and probably total financial shutdown since China essentially owns the US right now.

Bet they never thought that when they were selling all our farmland and our debt, they also were signing away basic ownership of the military! Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face......not to forget that China has its own military allies in the Middle East who really could unleash hell on the troops there.

Where do you think the radiation from hitting the Korean reactor will go? Over Japan, China and Esatern Russia and straight into Canada and the US. We'll know for sure even if it is not made public when people start dying of radiation poisoning and cancer rates begin to accelerate. Same goes for Iran, it would compromise too many American financial interests in Iraq and surrounding territories.

[edit on 15-6-2009 by secretagent woooman]

So basically you guys are saying we won't and can't do anything? LMAO!

Face it........there are only two options, conventional war going in there and taking out the regime or a nuclear strike/pre-emptive strike with huge bombs not nuclear.

Either option is a disaster in my opinion. The first much moreso than the second. Say what you want about KJI and NK but they have millions of troops and sending in our troops would be suicide. The second option is much more realistic. Maybe not nukes but definitely several hundred bunker busters. Either way the longer our government waits the more dangerous NK's threats get. Again, you can downplay NK's threats all you want but they are the only country with nuclear capability actually threatening to use them. Selling them to a terrorist is another likely scenario. You bet your bottom dollar the US government needs to do something, what is up for debate. It sure as hell isn't going to be more sanctions. I think NK will end up launching something and killing lots of people justifying the western powers to go in an take out the country. THe US people will be behind this much more so than Iraq. We are headed for a depression and more economic decline.

I can not believe what some of you are posting.The BS headlines over the last few weeks has got you baa-ing along to there tune.Hi night watch,glad to see you and some others posting with some sanity.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
I honestly just do not get Kim. What is he after? From NK's perspective what good can come of this? He is the one who has created his enemies, namely China and Russia. They probably aren't enemies but they appear to be against him on this. Has he become so paranoid about the US attacking him that he doesn't use sense?

Kim hates the US with a purple passion.

Did the US "use sense" when it dropped two devastating bombs on Japan? No, and I know it was in revenge for Pearl Harbor, but still, restraint is needed by those who run the world. Back then we were the only ones with nuclear power but now we aren't king of the mountain anymore. I doubt very much the US would open fire on NK, we are in too much hot water already. Some other country will draw first blood as far as nuclear power is concerned, but we'll be right on their heels.

Ah,sorry.Though a little relevent to this thread,my previous post was aimed for another NK thread.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by gallifreyan medic


How dare you make sense! You must be a Neocon as I was called yesterday.....probably a Commie too!

reply to post by secretagent woooman


Old labour and I do support Liverpool football club.
Oh and a caring human being.

Guess that kind of puts me down on the list of being anti establishment and possibly a terrorist then.


[edit on 15/6/09 by gallifreyan medic]

Be realistic in terms of Russia and China

Some situations are beyond politics as usual...

All basic angers aside, The world can not afford the loss of Japan or South Korea economically at this time.

Add to that China nor Russia like NK that much more than anyone else, they are a convenient pawn, a thorn in the side of America

If North Korea preps for an Attack or Launches...

Don't be surprised if the agree is to use 3 Nukes, One from Russia, One from China and One from America



Lets not forget the NWO is about a global order, the handful of Nations ruling the world, the players might bicker and push each other over territories and the final drawing of the map, but in the end China and Russia are NWO too... North Korea is NOT OP might be wrong, Obama wont be King alone, but he is right too... The NWO WILL WILLINGLY Show the world who is boss and make an example

reply to post by mopusvindictus


If it plays out that way,then I sincerely hope NK can get one or two off.
Yes I'll get stick for saying that but come on people,if you give it,you got to be able to take it.

It will also add to the knowing of what TPTB did so called for the good and to know how it would have been for the other side.
Certainly would change the view of many who were for it,I am sure

Lets not forget Karma either,best get it back as soon as with it being of that kind of magnitude.

I don't see a preemptive strike on NK as being consistent with VP Biden's "spooky" statement. I don't think VP Biden has near that amount of foresight, for one thing, and another, I think NK was -- even at that time -- such a hot potato politically, that even VP Biden would've been warned off it.

I regard to the OP, if I had to pick what he was eluding to, I would guess it to be not standing with Israel in regard to Iran. Even now, in spite of what Sec. Clinton said about a U.S. response to a strike on Israel, I [regrettfully] guess that if Iran dropped a nuke on Israel, that the U.S. response would be a sad shake of the head, and perhaps an HBO special.

The US could launch a Nuke. All they would have to do is cause another False Flag attack, or even say NK launched a nuke, and they shot it down.

You can't say they won't use nukes. why have them then? Remember they dropped 2 Atomic bombs before.