It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Forgive me for saying but if you don't vote then you have absolutely no right to comment about all of this. If you spoiled your vote i would be fine with it, but to simply be to lazy to partake in democracy means you basically gave up your right to complain when things go wrong.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
IR, shame on you I will refrain from anger for saying I'm 'too lazy'.
Why on Earth would i vote or 'partake' in a system that is corrupt to the core?
I really believe the whole voting process is a façade. There was some awesome research done by Bev Harris, an housewife who exposed the software hacking they did for polling station machines in America. Overview video here. (Bev's site here).
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
I believe the same goes on in the UK. The numbers are all crunched before any election is even called. Besides, i also feel it's just a one-party system where policies and manifestos are flip-flopped depending on what orders are given to them from the higher up blood-lines.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
You had millions protesting in London before they went to Iraq to rape and pillage the oil, yet the g'ment still went ahead and invaded. The Americans called it a 'shock and awe' campaign; how ridiculous to stomp your way around the globe with their military might give such campaigns names that sound like bullying, yet people are complicit because they feel they have voted and made a difference!
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
Calling me lazy for not voting does make my blood boil as MP's vote themselves into power, just like the un-elected Brown. So why on Earth you think your vote counts, amuses me.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
However, you have a right to express your opinion and I value that opinion.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
I would also like to add the BS they said about 50% tax for 'the rich'. As if that would really happen!!! They just said that to appease the populous but in reality they'd work out ways to fly below the financial radar, otherwise you'd have every Tom, Dick and Harry earning over £100k leaving the country.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
Politics is a game, plain and simple. A play of words where they say whatever they think Joe Public wants to hear. I won't play their game and so i choose to abstain from voting. In a 'democracy' that is valid.
Sir Christopher added: "This is not something which can be done with a quick fix; we want to do a thorough piece of work. Our firm intention is to publish our report towards the end of the year."
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
Thanks for the reply IR, some good points.
Voting with pen 'n paper doesn't really count for much as it must be passed on further up the food chain, where the data is collated. That is where i would question the anonymity of counting.
However, you have made me question my non-voting as it seems there is some validity to UK voting. I was pleasantly surprised to find that the BNP have secured their first county council seat in Burnley, Lancashire. Not because it's BNP, but because it's a radical party that have won votes.
Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
Back on topic, i don't see any change to the expense scandal, nor any prosecutions. They have one of their own (Sir Christopher Kelly) investigating the claims, so it's business as usual.