Something about this doesn't make sense at all

During the late 40's and early 50's when media attention towards the buzz surrounding the UFO phenomenon, many international figures became sincerely interested. One of them was a man called Winston Churchill, whom some of you might recognise to have been the war-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.



In 1952 Churchill fired off a memo to his advisers in the wake of fresh UFO sightings in the United States. 'What does all this stuff about flying saucers amount to? What can it mean? What is the truth?' Churchill wrote. Whether it was the sincere belief there or not, the response to Churchill was that there was nothing of military significance to the subject, referring to the American's study of the phenomenon.

When the natural question is asked why the United States government would even hide the truth behind the UFO's in the first place, the common answer is that it would have complicated the post-war politics in a time where there was considerable anxiety over Russia's growing influence in post-Nazi territories in Europe. The ramifications of admitting to have retrieved sophisticated technology would have meant an acceleration towards the Cold War, if not the mutual sharing of power to every nation on Earth. Unacceptable in the eyes of the US. However what doesn't make sense is that in common UFOlogy it is understood that the Russians themselves retried crashed vehicles decades afterwards. Yet seemingly having knowledge that we are not alone and being visited had no affect on geopolitics. Fast forward to today and there are reported coverups in every continent on Earth, and interestingly involving nations of every spectrum - from the far East to Latin America. In fact it is believed certain world governments are in cahoots over the UFO subject. That would be the natural conclusion if we are to accept that they have learnt these lights in the skies are more than just lights.

However that conclusion, the 'exopolitics' yet again seemingly has no impact on geopolitics. Potential adversaries in the Chinese and Russians still exist. Latin America still, in financial meltdown, considers itself oppressed and bullied by their northern counter-parts. The British have no global political interests yet are seemingly believed to be one of the key-partners in crime over this cover up.

They either know, or don't know. The Mexican government a few years back released that famous footage taken by one of their military planes. However a decade back the Brazilians are believed to have been involved in a Roswell-like incident. And yet none of these countries have seemingly gained in anything. Think logically for a moment and if your a small nation that is in constant view of evidence that could change the world, and you are asked to remain quite, you would be lighting up a cigar with a smile. I'm just trying to comprehend how this UFO subject, and the belief that they know, can be compatible with the history of our politics and indeed present-today politics. 9/11, for example, had a tremendous political impact namingly the relationship between the US and some Middle Eastern states. Or look at the situation in North Korea - where even it's allies in China are concerned that it could spark a weapons race in the region, the world is united in condemnation and concern. But the existence of advanced civilisations visiting our world, interfering with nuclear weapons etc, isn't enough to trigger considerable change and unite the world's governments?

Any thoughts on this?

If only it was as simple as that, unfortunately the way I see it there are groups within groups some working on projects on this planet some on others.

Crazy I know but backed up with the evidence Gary Mckinnon uncovered when he hacked in to the pentagon files showed off world craft names and personel.

Think for a moment you have all this technology under lock and key but you can't do anything with it without changing the world, which means changing political power by giving more rights to the people. i,e free energy, better health e.t.c so what do you do?

Simple: you tell everyone that all the planets that we have journeyed to do not support life and do not have a breathable atmosphere. That takes care of the the people in the field that would ask all the questions.

My guess is that if we were to see Mars for what it is really is we would see buildings, transport, humans and hybrids and a whole lot more than a barren poisonous planet.

There is no way in my mind that a few groups of humans can wield so much power and keep such a tight lid so secret without the help of an external source.

In regards to politics, its a need to know basis.

This subject is so vast its impossible to comprehend on one level its so fragmented into metaphysics, physics,science,technology and politics with many sub categories. To try and comprehend just one part takes a great deal of research and commitment.

Did you know that there is project on this earth controlled by power hungry people that feeds small parts of alien technology to electronic companies for research and development every year in order to advance our technology for them to have more control over us. Again sounds crazy right? you would be suprised.




[edit on 2-6-2009 by franspeakfree]

If Churchill made those statements in 1952, it seems it was a reaction to the 1952 Washington DC sightings, which got a ton of attention. Crash saucer stories are another thing entirely. Certainly all of them can't be legit. Perhaps one of them is.

I still don't understand why there is no relationship between 'Exopolitics' and geopolitics