i have a question???

how fast did the plane crash in the world trade centre , if its over 500 than we have a problem

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 31-5-2009 by dino1989]

[edit on 31-5-2009 by dino1989]

Why is that a problem? Couldl you please explain more of what you are talking about? I would like to participate but there is not enough info here.

reply to post by justsomeboreddude



I believe he's referring to a jumbo jet traveling at that speed in low altitude? I don't think it to be possible for a 747/757 to achieve this at anything but very high altitudes?

If so, there is a point to be made for his argument. At least from looking at the video, the thing seems to be traveling quite fast! More resembling a tomahawk missle than a jumbo jet?

Peace.

Problem is no -one is saying how far it flew at over 500mph. it could have been much higher and within the last few miles done a slow dive and levelled out.

What we need is the Classified security camera's at the Pentagon, Forget all the pilot theories that the plan could not fly that fast or crash right through the building or dive at a steep angle into the Pentagon and not hit the ground first. Or where’s the wing marks on the outside of the Pentagon.

Just show me the untouched Perimeter security camera’s at the Pentagon. –which are all now classified bar one, that shows nothing.

Someone actually tested this using state of art flight simulator - found
that 767 could easily reach 650 mph (.86 mach) at low altitudes

767 has reputation as a "hot ship" do to high thrust engines and a
clean exterior configuration (no external drag inducing bulges)

In fact 767 is certified for one engine take off at full load and can fly
the Atlantic on only one engine.

Here is long article about the test

911blogger.com...

In fact AA11 was calculated traveling at ~470 mph when impacted North
Tower

United 175 was estimated at some 530 to 560 mph at impact time


So answer is yes 767 can exceed 500mph at low level.....