It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Applesandoranges
The ending of it sounded scary what did she mean by brain implant?
Originally posted by Aim64C
Originally posted by Applesandoranges
The ending of it sounded scary what did she mean by brain implant?
We have the technology, now.
Unlike what we used to think - we've found that the brain is an extremely adaptive system. You can connect probes to any portion of your brain (well, technically, you don't even need to do that, newer technologies will allow monitoring of brain activity via a headband and altered LED technology) and use some logical method to illicit an output from the activity, and your brain will eventually learn to use something.
Now, obviously, attaching implants to regions of the brain that correspond with their desired function expedites the process. So does programming the implant to "meet the brain halfway" - to equally learn how to interface with the individual's brain.
That said - it's only a matter of time until you are able to "expand your mind" into an implant. Having access to a digital processor would make math a matter of reading the problem and "seeing/understanding" the answer. You wouldn't have to think about math anymore than you had to think about the punch-line of a joke.
Of course - this is all made easier if you first have an understanding of math - so it would be likely that early-generation models would require an individual to know at least basic math in order to learn to interface with the device. A likely training process would be sitting in front of math problems and a visual output display of the 'answer' being provided by the device. As you read, it would display answers. This serves two purposes - first, you begin to recognize its response to your brain (some set of frequencies) as being certain numbers - and you begin to learn to control the device so that it understands what problem you are presenting to it.
We already have implants that allow quadriplegics to operate machinery with thought alone (it's still under development - but has been demonstrated with a few voluntary subjects) - the same has been done with a monkey. Other implants allow blind people to see (only those who developed the optical nerves, however - people blind at birth are a little out of luck, here).
We have the technology - it's just not yet marketable (too few people could afford it to make it and put it in the pharmacy).