It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And if Japan did that they risk NK unleashing a volley of hardware all over the 10 million citizens of Seoul.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
And if Japan did that they risk NK unleashing a volley of hardware all over the 10 million citizens of Seoul.
NK striking Seoul, their compatriots, because Japan, their enemies attacked them? It would be more likely that SK would condemn the japanese attack than NK attacking Seoul.
NK views the South as an enemy. Not as a compatriot. Hence the Korean war. Hence the Armistice recently reneged.
You haven't noticed the 10.000 strong artillery all along the border and all aimed at Seoul then?
Originally posted by DohBama
Originally posted by AllexxisF1
No there is no confusion about this. North Korea threatened to pull the armistice. They have not pulled it nor announced that they have. Because they would have to go to the U.N. and make their declaration heard officially.
Ahem:
Fears have increased of military skirmishes, particularly in disputed waters off the western coast, after North Korea conducted the nuclear test on Monday and then renounced the truce that has kept peace between the Koreas since the Korean War ended in 1953.
I feel safer already:
"I don't think that anybody in the (Obama) administration thinks there is a crisis," Gates told reporters aboard his military jet early Friday.
NKorea test-fires missile, slams Security Council
Yep, we're in very good hands... luckily we elected the most experienced, accomplished and unapologetically American president in history!
Errrr... um... hmmm...
D'Oh!