The Link is Revealed .... An Anunnaki Child ?

So where are all the hi def pictures of the "lemur" (that looks like a lizard)?

Let me guess - NASA is in charge of the photography?

Seriously this is so look at the right hand while the left is doing something else. This is a conspiracy site last time I checked. Yet most here believe the main stream press release that this IS what it IS.

BS

This IS BS.

Thanks for listening - the History channel is on par with Fox news.

wZn

Originally posted by bloodline

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by bloodline

 

It wasn't a lemur as it didn't have a tooth comb and had opposable thumbs. It is the link between ancient primates and modern primates. It's the transitional fossil. The link. Hence the name.

But definately not alien...

Sweet.

You think the annunaki are angry we found and dug up the grave of one of their dead babies?

Absolutely I do!

Also, it's not a lemur, and it doesn't predate lemurs. It's the link between lemurs and the more modern type of primate. It lacks the tooth comb and it has opposeable thumbs. Not a Leumr.

Originally posted by Evisscerator
Did anyone see the History Channel presentation on May 25th regarding the finding of the Missing Link?

If Sumerian Texts are correct, what these folks have found could very well be a very well preserved Anunnaki Child and they either don't know it, don't accept it or are to arrogant and stupid to admit it.

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

That child went missing sometime in the last 400,000 years, as long as the Anunnaki have been visiting our world.

Your thoughts and opinions on this are welcome. Please don't flame me for thinking outside the box.

Hmm.. It is a interesting idea, but wasn't the found fossil clearly a Lemur?
The Anunnaki's first set of hybrids was clearly not Lemurs, but a crossbreed by primate and Anunnaki, so I somewhat doubt that the result would look like a Lemur?

I thought the whole special was a load of crap, the 'scientists' are so desperate to validate the darwin theory that they will call anything they dig up a missing link. To me it looks like plenty of animals we have today, so what...

Originally posted by Evisscerator
If Sumerian Texts are correct, what these folks have found could very well be a very well preserved Anunnaki Child

What Sumerian text would that be? And for that matter, could you please tell us what Sumerian text talks about the Annunaki beings aliens or creating humans or even looking anything like that fossil? Not an interpretation from Sitchin, but the actual text that says anything like this.

Originally posted by Evisscerator
and they either don't know it, don't accept it or are to arrogant and stupid to admit it.

At the risk of falling into the trap of an appeal to authority, you are calling them stupid and arrogant, calling their findings a crock, despite the fact they have studied this fossil for year and all you have done is watch a TV show about it.