The Link is Revealed .... An Anunnaki Child ?

Did anyone see the History Channel presentation on May 25th regarding the finding of the Missing Link?

If Sumerian Texts are correct, what these folks have found could very well be a very well preserved Anunnaki Child and they either don't know it, don't accept it or are to arrogant and stupid to admit it.

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

That child went missing sometime in the last 400,000 years, as long as the Anunnaki have been visiting our world.

Your thoughts and opinions on this are welcome. Please don't flame me for thinking outside the box.

An interesting hypothesis indeed. I will say for conversation sake that when I watched the docu and initially saw the tail (or reptilian shape) that the first thing that popped in my head was "Annunaki"

I am curious though, where are getting the 400,000 years as opposed to the 47 million? For writing purposes I've delved into almost everything 2012, returning of the annunaki, nibiru, etc...but I've never heard mention 400,000.

reply to post by Evisscerator

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

Ok you throw out a theory that this thing is an Annunuki child and you have the nerve to say that the SCIENTISTS saying it was 47 milllion years old is a crock of crap, because it doesnt agree with some fairy tale. At the rate you are denying ignorance the earth will be flat again next week.

Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Evisscerator

 

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

Ok you throw out a theory that this thing is an Annunuki child and you have the nerve to say that the SCIENTISTS saying it was 47 milllion years old is a crock of crap, because it doesnt agree with some fairy tale. At the rate you are denying ignorance the earth will be flat again next week.

With the way N.Korea is going, I think you may be correct with your statement good sir!!

BTW I agree with what you say. Annunki is a crock...... unproveble (or however its spelt)

reply to post by RenDMC


LOL. Yeah it might be flat. Well hopefully just the North Korean part. Maybe we can trade it to China for some debt reduction after we turn it into a parking lot.

Ok is your name a mix of Run-DMC and Ren from Ren and Stimpy?

Originally posted by Evisscerator
Did anyone see the History Channel presentation on May 25th regarding the finding of the Missing Link?

If Sumerian Texts are correct, what these folks have found could very well be a very well preserved Anunnaki Child and they either don't know it, don't accept it or are to arrogant and stupid to admit it.

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

That child went missing sometime in the last 400,000 years, as long as the Anunnaki have been visiting our world.

Your thoughts and opinions on this are welcome. Please don't flame me for thinking outside the box.

You sure are thinking outside the box. When I say 'box' though I actually mean 'reality'. It's a Lemur.

A LEMUR.

It is not an alien. It's a lemur.




A LEMUR!!!!!!!!!!!

Say it three times. Go outside.

reply to post by bloodline


The Annunuki crowd think Lemur was just the little alien baby's first name.

Join me in my rhyme... this is my second line.

Ummm I didn't see the documentary can anyone provide a pic or video of this "missing link?"

As for the annunaki thing, i don't know, but I do know that there had to be something very strange that happened on this planet in our distant past.

The recurring theme of advanced creatures from the heavens coming down and teaching us junk is too farspread to be simple myths or legends of simple man.

Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by bloodline

 

The Annunuki crowd think Lemur was just the little alien baby's first name.

Join me in my rhyme... this is my second line.

One two buckle my shoe.

According to this post: Lemurs are now to be considered aliens from another planet.

Ever seen that movie 'morons from outer space'? One of my faves and a sci-fi classic in my book.

reply to post by bloodline


Somehow I think if we were bred from aliens from space there appears to be a high likelihood of the aliens being morons.

reply to post by bloodline


It wasn't a lemur as it didn't have a tooth comb and had opposable thumbs. It is the link between ancient primates and modern primates. It's the transitional fossil. The link. Hence the name.

But definately not alien...

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by bloodline

 

It wasn't a lemur as it didn't have a tooth comb and had opposable thumbs. It is the link between ancient primates and modern primates. It's the transitional fossil. The link. Hence the name.

But definately not alien...

Sweet.

You think the annunaki are angry we found and dug up the grave of one of their dead babies?

How did these little Lemur-like, Annunaki critters mate with women and produce giants and men of reknown? That's what some enquiring minds want to know. Well, me, anyway.

wow some people are really reaching here. a lost annunaki child? come on man, listen to yourself before you post. if you watched the show then you saw the LEMUR skeleton, and the FOSSIL. They were nearly the same.

Hmmm, catch me if I'm crazy, but isn't this post based on a television show which is broadcast to the American people all around the country? Im pretty sure big brother wouldn't let some valuable info like that reach EVERYBODY.

Its a ancient primate said to have close similarities to a Lemur. Because it prdates Lemur's by afew million years its not not exactly a Lemur but i would say that name is much better than a half breed bastard child of legendary alien god. Its not a annunaki Its brain is about the size of my left nut.

reply to post by Evisscerator



Why is it that the term 'Missing Link' implies that we are only missing a single fossil record to answer the entire question of evolution?

Darwin himself said that if within 100 years of his proposed theory, if the discovery of hundreds or thousands of transitional fossils are not found to support his theory, then his theory should be re-evaluated and another theory developed.

Karb0n

Originally posted by Evisscerator

Their timeline of 47 million years old is a crock of crap.

That child went missing sometime in the last 400,000 years, as long as the Anunnaki have been visiting our world.

So you mean to tell me that our carbon dating has a 117.5% + or - margin for error?

You either accept carbon dating or you don't. You can't invoke it or ignore it when the dates don't match your theory.

I thought the same thing...it looked more like a lizard man to me than some ape man.

reply to post by mostlyspoons


lmgtfy.com... - "Was that so hard?"

Rhyme a second time, as I sign MY second line.