It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

why do people still think ....

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 27 2009 @ 09:24 PM
link   
first sorry for my English

Why do people still think an airplane can travel few feet of the ground at 400MPH ?


yes I'm talking about the pentagon attack

Do people have a brain? I heard many people who think an airplane can fly that low at that speed ,i saw this guy or a girls video on YouTube he/she was attacking everyone who questions the government

he/she said a plane can travel that fast, He/She showed a video of 757 traveling 60 feet of the ground at 90MPH and that was his/hers proof a 757 can travel 6-15 feet of the ground at 400MPH



Wow just wow, I remember when I was watching the guys who made loose change going out on the street saying an airplane CANT do that and people called them idiots

seriously I have lost ALL hope in humanity

OK if your still think an airplane can travel that fast at that altitude, think of like a kite do you think a kit is gonna stay few meters of the ground at 400 MPH? No it will shoot up in the air and you cant do anything to stop it , unless you make a hole in the paper

many people arguing against the 9/11 truth movement only proof a 757 crashed into the pentagon is that they saw a 1 engine part so its 100% proof its a 757, but when you contact Rolls-Royce they say that's not our engine

i bet the government is now gonna change the story and say well the terrorist hijacked a small airplane and disguised it as a 757 American airline and crashed it or they some how managed to find a bomb and drop it at the pentagon

EDIT::



[edit on 27-5-2009 by dino1989]



posted on May, 27 2009 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 


Well first off welcome to ATS.

I'm not a big 9/11 poster either way. But correct me if I'm wrong here.
I never understood this argument. Shouldn't that be the plane couldn't crash at those speeds? I mean it was really wasn't flying it was crashing


[edit on 27-5-2009 by SLAYER69]



posted on May, 27 2009 @ 10:15 PM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 


So basically you are trying to say your proof for it cant be a plane is that it is impossible for a plane to land?

If it wasnt a plane what was it?

Havent you ever seen the video of the plane flying into it?



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 08:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by dino1989
 


So basically you are trying to say your proof for it cant be a plane is that it is impossible for a plane to land?

If it wasn't a plane what was it?

Haven't you ever seen the video of the plane flying into it?


please use your brain

airplanes slows down when they lands like 100-90-80-70-60-50..... ETC

the US government wants us to believe a guy who NEVER flown a 757, flew the plane 6-15 feet of the ground at 400+ MPH ....right right and the moon is made out of cheese


[edit on 28-5-2009 by dino1989]



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 08:47 AM
link   
Where is the wreckage? Where is the wreckage? Where is it? Where are the scraps of plane and engine? If the round hole in the pentagon were caused by a plane crashing into it where are the wings? The fire? The wreckage? DUH



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join