It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. "I've heard occasional speculation that I'm a different man after 9/11. I wouldn't say that, but I'll freely admit that watching a coordinated, devastating attack on our country from an underground bunker at the White House can affect how you view your responsibilities."
"The first attack on the World Trade Center was treated as a law- enforcement problem, with everything handled after the fact: arrests, indictments, convictions, prison sentences, case closed."
That is more of a swing at Obama rather than a punch to him. After all unless we have seen the whole truth we don't know if Obama is really telling us less than half of it. Though given basically all politicians are lying scum, I'll be you are right this is a punch to Obama because when is the last time he's told us the truth about anything?
"By presidential decision last month, we saw the selective release of documents relating to enhanced interrogations. This is held up as a bold exercise in open government, honoring the public's right to know. We're informed as well that there was much agonizing over this decision. Yet somehow, when the soul searching was done and the veil was lifted on the policies of the Bush administration, the public was given less than half the truth."
The constitution and federal code long ago criminalized the actions of Obama's predecessor. To say Obama criminalized torture just does not make sense. You could argue that Obama is criminalizing toruture in that he really does not want it. Good. And as for intelligence operators and lawyers who allow anything that remotely resembles torture to take place under their watch, they are traitors and deserve a long prison sentence. National security requires we have policies in place that prevent unconvicted people from being punished. After all, nobody is secure when the constiution is getting ignored.
"It's hard to imagine a worse precedent filled with more possibilities for trouble and abuse than to have an incoming administration criminalize the policy decisions of its predecessor. Apart from doing a serious injustice to intelligence operators and lawyers, who deserve far better for their devoted service, the danger here is a loss of focus on national security and what it requires."
Dick Cheney does not value freedoms. He values security. He is a patriot to fascism. His whole vice presidency was about sacrificing our freedoms in the name of safety, and he may not have even had a problem if 2,000 Americans "had to die to make the other 300 million safer". Since he worked to block the investigation, I'll believe he is guilty. I have no doubt he values America and wants it to be secure. But that alone does not make him a patriot because you also have to value the constitution over your own personal security.
Dick Cheney is a true Patriot. If the GOP is looking for leadership and guidance they don't have to look any further than this man right here.
Originally posted by Tentickles
I am truly hoping that you are not serious...
Cheney has ruined this country in the eyes of the world.
We are no longer the land of the free, we are the land that tortures.
You going to make the same judgements when and after Barry screws this country up so badly that it takes generations to fix? Opps, that's right, the man walks on water.
I find it hard to believe that many of you actually think Barry is the next best thing to God or the return of the/a messiah....ironic, huh?
Originally posted by Seekerof
I find it hard to believe that many of you actually think Barry is the next best thing to God or the return of the/a messiah....ironic, huh?
4. "It's hard to imagine a worse precedent filled with more possibilities for trouble and abuse than to have an incoming administration criminalize the policy decisions of its predecessor. Apart from doing a serious injustice to intelligence operators and lawyers, who deserve far better for their devoted service, the danger here is a loss of focus on national security and what it requires."