LOOK: There is no United color debris in the dumpster!

Originally posted by ATH911
There is no debris with United Airlines colors in this infamous dumpster photo!

The closest business to the crash site was . . . tadah! . . . a SCRAP YARD! What a coincidence!

Was there any United colored debris found at the site????????

I got banned at unDemocratic Underground for posting this.

Interesting and something I never thought of.

And LOL at them Banning you for posting a pic. What a fun crowd they must be.

Dont think so, they didnt do that with the WTC towers so why would they bother with a an airplane?

Best regards

Loke.

Right on, excellent answer!!

as far as i am aware all the reckage of the plane from shanksville was taken to a place called iron mountain. this isnt gospel truth as its second hand info from a show or clip i watched a while back ill try to dig it out. if that is the case then it would explain why none of the plane is in there?

reply to post by ATH911


I am simply pointing out the facts. There is nothing that can be done to satisfy you. Even if I posted more pictures showing wreckage of Flight 93, you would simply say, "Well how do I know where that picture was taken?" Hence my last post. If any of the dozens of people that helped pick up the wreckage came on here and posted their stories, you would say that the "bad guys" bought them off. If any of the photographers came on and said that, yes, they had taken those pictures at Shanksville, you would say the same thing. Therefore, there is no way you will ever accept any of the evidence, because, in the end there is NO way to satisfy your need for proof of where it came from.

Originally posted by ATH911
I got banned at unDemocratic Underground for posting this.

I'm sure it didn't have anything to do with your attitude.

If you haven't already I recommend you read the Terms and Conditions of Use.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

The only non farfetched explanation of one piece of debris with logo colors on it because that's the only UA piece they could borrow for a photo shoot. There's no guarantee the photo is taken at the Shanksville scene!

Originally posted by intrepid
I'm sure it didn't have anything to do with your attitude.

If you haven't already I recommend you read the Terms and Conditions of Use.

Did I break a rule or come across having an attitude problem?

Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I think flight 93 did indeed crash there, but it was most likely shot down by the Air Force.

Wouldn't there be debris leading up to where it crash, not after where you think it crashed?

Originally posted by ATH911
Did I break a rule or come across having an attitude problem?

Break a rule? I don't know. Attitude problem? Yes, it really did seem that way. In the first page of this thread, many people tried to respond to your comments, but your replies were sarcastic and patronizing. I don't know if this was your intention (hopefully not), but given that this is a text based forum, sometimes emotions and tone of voice is lost of mangled.

reply to post by ATH911


The debris field was a good 8-10 miles wide. It cut a large swath over a wide area.

reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf


You have any pics of it? I am one the fence on this particular crash. I have seen pics of a unbelievably tiny crater with no debris, but I have never seen anything else. It doesn't fit other plane crash pics I have seen in the past. Neither does it seem to represent the elasticity of the ground. It seems to me that something should have bounced, and given the speed at which they were supposedly going, it should have bounced hard and high. But then that is an assumption. I don't know much about the make up of the ground in that area. If it was soft and spongy soil like you would see in a swamp, I can see a plan getting swallowed hole.

Anyway, I digress. Anyone have any arial views of the entire debris field?

posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by ATH911

 

If any of the dozens of people that helped pick up the wreckage came on here and posted their stories, you would say that the "bad guys" bought them off.

If any of the photographers came on and said that, yes, they had taken those pictures at Shanksville, you would say the same thing.

But none of these alleged wreckage picker-upper people are stepping forward and supporting you are they? None of these alleged Shanksville debris photographers are stepping forward and supporting you are they? Why are they hiding? Because they are FBI 'photographers'? Because they are FBI 'wreckage picker-uppers'? The 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY is in big trouble and self-destructing right before your eyes. You need them badly and where are they?

So where are all these witnesses to the aircraft knocking down the light poles and the light pole sticking out of the windshield and the 70 tons of aircraft getting dug out of a soft dirt hole and the passengers still strapped into Flt 77 seats? Where are the witnesses stepping forward to verify that wreckage in a room photo which first showed up in Italy, alleging to be from the Pentagon? Why have the agents (concerned citizens?) guarding the taxi and Lloyde not stepped forward? Why hasn't Harley Guy stepped forward? Why hasn't the guy finding the paper passport in the WTC rubble stepped forward?

Because they are all FBI, Secret Service, CIA, or Mossad agents and cannot step forward?

Why are the only witnesses stepping forward publicly unafraid to make their faces and names known always describing a different story than the official story? Why is it that YOUR witnesses have all gone into hiding? Why is it that your fellow government loyalists are unable to find even one witness and unwilling to question even one eyewitness of ours?

I might be missing something, but I'll ask this anyway.

Planes are pretty big. Isn't it possible that the small amount of debris in that picture were from parts of the plane that don't have paint on them?

reply to post by rogerstigers


Pics? Of an debris field stretching miles? Unlikely, unless I took it from space. Even then, not much would show up.

Reports from both eyewitnesses, rescue teams, even the FBI, state one engine was found a half mile from the site. Other bits and pieces were found further.

Since it ultimately crashed in a stripmine that had been reclaimed, i highly doubt it would have "rolled or bounced" since the soil is quite soft.

reply to post by SPreston

But none of these alleged wreckage picker-upper people are stepping forward and supporting you are they? None of these alleged Shanksville debris photographers are stepping forward and supporting you are they? Why are they hiding? Because they are FBI 'photographers'? Because they are FBI 'wreckage picker-uppers'? The 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY is in big trouble and self-destructing right before your eyes. You need them badly and where are they?

Um, they have stepped forward, their stories are on the internet. Your ignorance blinds you to that fact.

reply to post by ATH911


And I refer you to the post I made a few days ago, before the moderator stepped in.

Originally posted by Totakeke
I might be missing something, but I'll ask this anyway.

Planes are pretty big. Isn't it possible that the small amount of debris in that picture were from parts of the plane that don't have paint on them?

It's possible someone can win 100 jackpot lotto's in a row also. I wouldn't want to calculate those odds.

reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

It's all after the crash spot. A shoot down would only make sense if the plane came in the opposite direction.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

Are you talking about you closedminded post?