It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Common Good
The way this sounds to me, its pretty simple really.
Dealer one(USA) has a bag of sugar at the price of $50.
Dealer two(China) has a bag of sugar at the price of $45.
Dealer one gets mad at dealer two for selling cheaper goods to stay in buisness while driving dealer one in the dirt.
So Dealer One wages war on Dealer Two to keep the Market fair.
Makes sense to me.
If I am way off on this, hip me to the game.
Originally posted by Common Good
The way this sounds to me, its pretty simple really.
Dealer one(USA) has a bag of sugar at the price of $50.
Dealer two(China) has a bag of sugar at the price of $45.
Dealer one gets mad at dealer two for selling cheaper goods to stay in buisness while driving dealer one in the dirt.
So Dealer One wages war on Dealer Two to keep the Market fair.
Makes sense to me.
If I am way off on this, hip me to the game.
Originally posted by Common Good
But if you both have the same quality material, and you sell it for WAY less than I am, isnt that in itself a monopoly?
Originally posted by Common Good
Whats your take on all of this?