It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by csulli456
Facts: A BBC reporter reported Building 7 collapsed some 20 or 30 minutes before it did. You can actually see the building still standing behind her as she reports this. It is through the window during a live shot.
Originally posted by csulli456
Sorry, but I don`t want you to derail my thread here please.
I`m not here to argue that video.
Originally posted by csulli456
Wanna talk about your ideas about how the top of the tower was orchestrated with such intricate detail that it was planned to take out Building 7?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
WTC7 wasn't even close to being damaged enough to remotely collapse
Captain Chris Boyle...
on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.
Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did.
The biggest decision we had to make on the first day was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building heavily involved in fire. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt.
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden...
also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
WTC4, WTC5 and WTC6 sustained heavy to severe damage and still stood?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
the picture and video speak for themselves. I'll believe what I can see with my own eyes over anybody elses words.
The major concern at that time was number Seven, building number Seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. –FDNY Chief Frank Fellini
.......
Seven World Trade Center was teetering on collapse - Richard Picciotto, FDNY Battalion Commander
........
The whole south side of Seven World Trade had been hit by the collapse of the second Tower. – Fire Captain Brenda Berkman
.......
Everything came crashing through the front of number 7 - EMS Division Chief Jon Peruggia
.......
I remember standing there looking over at building 7 and realizing that a big chunk of the lower floors had been taken out on the Vesey Street side.
- Deputy–Chief Nick Visconti
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
People tend to over-exaggerate alot
Originally posted by Curious_Agnostic
Like I said earlier, it was a hectic day. I'm not even sure how sure the first firefighter I quoted was about the hole being 20 stories tall. He probably didn't stop to count the floors, but instead probably just made a quick estimate.
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
Lets not forget who had offices in there and what that building had .....
how convienent wouldn't you say.
Originally posted by Curious_Agnostic
However, doesn't seeing that damaged corner make you wonder how damaged the lower part of the south side was?
Originally posted by Curious_Agnostic
I'm no expert in physics and architecture, but those were smaller buildings. They didn't have the weight factor going against them as much as building 7 did.
Originally posted by bsbray11
I've seen photos of the South face, and you can't see how much damage is there (there is smoke around the base) but you can definitely see how much isn't there. At any rate, NIST even concluded that damage from WTC1 was not a dominant factor in WTC7's collapse, but the fire was. So even the "official" people are saying, the damage WTC1 inflicted was not significant.
Originally posted by bsbray11
You should have stopped after saying you were no expert in physics or architecture.. How much a building weighs has absolutely nothing to do with any of this, because every extra pound that has to be carried is carried by that much extra steel.