It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Moon Rising - The truth about the moon revealed

page: 10
71
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by PrisonerOfSociety
 


I'll try one more time.

This time, just use your own eyes...look at the phases of the Moon. Pay particular attention to what we call the "New Moon".

Please recall, we are in agreement, are we not, that one hemisphere of the Moon is always facing the Earth? OK....then, when it is a 'New Moon' the side facing us is in darkness. The 'farside' is in brilliant sunlight.

When we see the 'phases' of the Moon we are seeing its "day/night" cycle...remember, its 'day' is about 2 earth weeks long.

Your answer about the Apollo 17 Ascent Module lift-off was correct...the guy at Mission Control practiced a lot, since he failed during the Apollo 16 attempt to track the LM at lift-off.

But, ermmm....your attempt to claim that a laser reflector could be 'parachuted' to the Moon's surface fails for two reasons: One, a parachute won't work without an atmosphere (duh!) and, Two, simply dropping the reflector won't ensure its proper alignment with the Earth!!

It is simply far more convoluted for the 'Moon Landing Hoax' believers to attempt to wriggle and twist everything when the truth of the Apollo missions is staring them in the face!!!

BTW, your use of the term "astro-nots" is highly insulting. That sort of juvenile behaviour is best left to the teenagers at the 'utubes'.....

Remember, this thread is about an alleged cover-up...not of the truth of Apollo landings, but of the possibility that they were not alone. AND that neatly explains that chestnut of a news conference with Armstrong and friends...and I am so tired of seeing that one trotted out, it is getting pathetic.



posted on May, 24 2009 @ 02:19 PM
link   
BUT..if you drop your we did or did not go stuff...& just look at the content ..that the photos are still being messed with by NASA..its got legs...Have you skeptical types even seen it?



posted on May, 24 2009 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Here's my interpretation of rotation:

(click to open player in new window)


Edit:


BTW, your use of the term "astro-nots" is highly insulting. That sort of juvenile behaviour is best left to the teenagers at the 'utubes'.....


Whatever...



Remember, this thread is about an alleged cover-up...not of the truth of Apollo landings, but of the possibility that they were not alone. AND that neatly explains that chestnut of a news conference with Armstrong and friends...and I am so tired of seeing that one trotted out, it is getting pathetic.


Okay, let's conveniently dismiss that conference, which i think is very telling...

[edit on 24-5-2009 by PrisonerOfSociety]



posted on May, 24 2009 @ 02:33 PM
link   
is there a torrent file?




posted on May, 25 2009 @ 12:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
Here's my interpretation of rotation:


Only problem with your diagram... is you forgot the Sun... which is the light source...



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 12:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by zerbot565
but that then beggs the question : if the u.s and cccp payed with "open hands" showing their decks to each other yet bluffing with others who are we missing from the table, not being seen nor heard.


Not quite 'open hands' more like cooperative rivalry...




did someone beat em yet is keeping a lid on it ?


Yes...

Who? Well that is still the question I am looking for answers too..

According to Ron Blackburn and John Lear (and others) it was the NAZI's and they are still in control along with the Zionists... (ask me some other time for another thread or u2u if you want more)

According to Buzz Aldrin it was the Chinese. Currently Buzz is partner in Gravwave LLC working on anti gravity with China... here is what he says about the moon...

Buzz Aldrin - China Moon
noolmusic.com...

I mean he should know right? He says China will be going BACK to the moon... and this was before ChangE-1



or did fancy pictures produce nothing more then ballistics funding for the bluffing parties and a hole in the pocket for the taxpayers in each region that played the bluff.


There ya go... ballistics
Don't forget that Clementine mission was NOT a NASA program but a DOD/ NAVY project under the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO). It was known as the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) until it was renamed by the administration of President Bill Clinton in 1993... in other words Clementine was a Star Wars program.. says so right here (Just after it talks about the 50 foot deep, 100sq km frozen lake on the moon)
www.defenselink.mil...


The BMDO became better known in the public eye in 1994 when it launched a space probe, Clementine, to the Moon, in collaboration with NASA. The BMDO was primarily interested in field testing new satellite and space reconnaissance technologies incorporated in Clementine, technologies which enabled Clementine to discover pockets of ice at the Moon's south pole.


en.wikipedia.org...

The pretty COLOR pictures that Clemetine took were only a side line





id like to belive we ve gone beyond that but sadly data speaks for it self , man stays in orbit and drones and probes are launched deeper out.


I suppose it would depend what data you are looking at then...








...




[edit on 25-5-2009 by zorgon]



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:03 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


You are obviously provoking the intended viewers here, which is most welcomed on this site from what my brief interaction has taught us, but never the less as any yeo that is leaked, it and all information has been buried into the internet and as such pose no threat. However you have raised eyebrows and obviously you are aware of that.



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by tristar However you have raised eyebrows and obviously you are aware of that.


Yes I am aware of that. So ummm which office did you say you were with?


PS

Not buying the avatar...



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:25 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


You have already mentioned it.

Peace



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 03:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by PrisonerOfSociety
reply to post by Mclaneinc
 


This guy did the camera work


When they bounce lasers off the reflectors they supposedly placed on the moon (personally, i think they parachuted drones onto the lunar surface from a low pass orbit, as they didn't land on the moon), the signal takes 2.56secs there and back.

So they supposedly controlled the take-off camera from Houston with a 1.28sec lag taken into account !!



Yeah, I reckon it was the clean up the moon guy


But seriously, it all seems so contrived and far too amazing in both technical instant ability and timescale. As people know, the shuttle gets decommissioned next year but even with planning for this they don't think the replacement vehicle will be ready for at least 2015 and the US will have to rely on the Russian space team to take us up and down.

So in the same sort of time scale with vastly increased technology Nasa can't even get the new aires orion combo ready just to do inner space flights, yet in those days we apparently under time constraints and budget cuts created a whole space team and calculated every detail using computers that would make a 4yr old laugh with numerous known failures and unproven data but they did it first time without a hitch.

It makes me laugh to be honest, these days Nasa cancels flights because of weather, small cracks on tiles, the fear of space debris etc etc which I totally respect because LIFE MATTERS but then they sent guys to the moon thru radiation belts in a craft that was almost paper thin that could have taken serious damage on a slightly misjudged landing.

They even to this day lose unmanned craft to mars but yet the Moon landing went superbly....?????????????????



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 04:59 AM
link   
the logics don't add up...

"light pollution" as such assume most certainly an atmosphere cause of it's dispersive effect

the light pollution theory also concerns the crosshairs...

if there was light pollution those non visible crosshairs on the black moon sky would most certainly be somewhat visible

furthermore one should know the physics of a human retina to conclude some ill logic in NASA explanations:

looking at the Moon horizon one would have "light pollution" effect of the upper retinal part of the eye...
however the lower retinal part could only register the light source such as stars and eventually Earth in the moon's sky (the effect just like the Moon in the Earth's sky....

as far as I remember from the provided link,Textthose astronauts claim they didn't see any stars whatsoever....
they most obviously must be not telling the thurth...


or there is some ubiquitus explanation that one cannot see any stars in space whatsoever due to lack of athmospheric physics
(that would assume stars are ONLY visible from Earths surface would it not)


could anyone provide some evidence that those astronauts on shuttle missions and space stations didn't see any stars whatsoever up there?

thanks for reply...



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Nonchalant
 


"Using false-color images of the surface of the Moon that we can actually SEE from our vantage point on Earth seems pretty unusual."

In the USGS web site there are false color images and "Natural Color" images. Go see for yourself. He is not using the false color images.



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 08:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


I just received an email from Mr. Escamilla. On the Anniversary today May 25, 1961, the day President Kennedy calls for a mission to send man to the moon, he is making Moon Rising available on You Tube for seven days for all to see. He is taking down his PPV and wants as many people to see this film. Look for it on his You Tube Channel, on his moon rising web site and other web sites he is having upload his film sometime today. It's being uploaded in HD. I think this is Great news! A serious decision on his part with his film. He felt compelled this morning to do this and it will be online soon! Jimmy2theR



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


Wow!

Please convey my thanks to Mr Escamilla in your future correspondence.

Apart from the fact this looks like a great film, this move will definitely help spark more interest in the area.

In High Quality Too - I can't wait.

If Mr. Escamilla actually does this; I predict a flood of moon threads. It will be great.

[edit on 25-5-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by darkraver
 




The most likely reason for not seeing the stars if you think about it is the fact the surface of the Moon is lit by bright sunlight your pupils close down due to the bright light so fainter stars would not be visible unless they looked at a dark area of sky without the glare of sunlight.
Think about when you go through a long dark tunnel in a train then when you come out into the light it takes a second or to for your eyes to adjust.



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 11:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jimmy2theR
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


I just received an email from Mr. Escamilla. On the Anniversary today May 25, 1961, the day President Kennedy calls for a mission to send man to the moon, he is making Moon Rising available on You Tube for seven days for all to see. He is taking down his PPV and wants as many people to see this film. Look for it on his You Tube Channel, on his moon rising web site and other web sites he is having upload his film sometime today. It's being uploaded in HD. I think this is Great news! A serious decision on his part with his film. He felt compelled this morning to do this and it will be online soon! Jimmy2theR



Thats so he wont have to give all the idiots that bought it a refund when he is shown to be talking BS!



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 11:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jimmy2theR
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


I just received an email from Mr. Escamilla. On the Anniversary today May 25, 1961, the day President Kennedy calls for a mission to send man to the moon, he is making Moon Rising available on You Tube for seven days for all to see. He is taking down his PPV and wants as many people to see this film. Look for it on his You Tube Channel, on his moon rising web site and other web sites he is having upload his film sometime today. It's being uploaded in HD. I think this is Great news! A serious decision on his part with his film. He felt compelled this morning to do this and it will be online soon! Jimmy2theR


Well if this is the case I'm going to see if I can catch it.



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008

Originally posted by Jimmy2theR
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


Thats so he wont have to give all the idiots that bought it a refund when he is shown to be talking BS!


Not answering this way. Jimmy2theR

[edit on 25-5-2009 by Jimmy2theR]

[edit on 25-5-2009 by Jimmy2theR]

[edit on 25-5-2009 by Jimmy2theR]



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Jimmy2theR
 


idiot here!!. last night i tried to purchase this film along with moon views. i paid the agreed amount and waited for my email. got my email signed in and can not download the movies.

sent an email but have yet to hear a response.

if this is true and he is showing this on youtube, then i want my money back!!



posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   
maybe a stupid question, but when does the movie come out, actually?

Can't wait for this one



new topics

top topics



 
71
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join