It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by turbofan
Using your best animation skills; series of stepped drawings; or even a detailed summary please explain how pole #1 entered Lloyd's car and wedged itself in the back seat.
In your answer you must consider the following:
- length of the pole
- size of hole in windshield
- curve of the pole
- direction of traffic flow on highway
- direction of force from 'aircraft'
- the resting point of the taxi cab in relation to pole #1
- offical story data
Sorry for the derail turbofan but I have a feeling you're not going to have too many takers on your challenge anyway!
Originally posted by tezzajw
None of the government loyalist debunkers that I have seen, have enough mathematical skill to consider the inertial moments of the light pole or possible spin rates of the light pole, to form some different equations. It's quite difficult to model the light pole's possible motions when striking the taxi.
Originally posted by tezzajw
turbofan, you're not going to get any replies in this thread that explain how the light pole was allegedly lodged in the taxi.
Until any government loyalist can prove, using detailed mathematics, that the light pole struck the taxi, according to 'Lloyde the truth telling prophet' then it DID NOT HAPPEN.
[edit on 7-5-2009 by tezzajw]
Originally posted by MrRandomGuy
What we SHOULD be focusing on is what the guy SAW.
What we SHOULD be focusing on is if flight 77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.
Trying to "mathematically calculate how the pole did this or that" is voluntary or involuntarily distracting us from more important issues.
Originally posted by MrRandomGuy
What we SHOULD be focusing on is what the guy SAW.
What we SHOULD be focusing on is if flight 77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.
Trying to "mathematically calculate how the pole did this or that" is voluntary or involuntarily distracting us from more important issues.
Originally posted by MrRandomGuy
As a general believer of the official story (it does have holes though, which is why I'm here there and everywhere ) I think it's completely pointless to debate about whether or not a pole struck the Taxi Driver's cab.
What we SHOULD be focusing on is what the guy SAW.
What we SHOULD be focusing on is if flight 77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.
Trying to "mathematically calculate how the pole did this or that" is voluntary or involuntarily distracting us from more important issues.