It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Biohazard³¹³
Oh boys it's just a reflection:
Could a planet be on the terrain?
Originally posted by _Phoenix_
reply to post by Biohazard³¹³
Your obviously confused, the obvious lens flare moves when the camera moves. BUT the object near the sun does not move from position at any time. MEANING it is NOT a lens flare.
[edit on 4-5-2009 by _Phoenix_]
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Look at the relative size of the "object". If it's not literally touching the sun it would have to be larger than Jupiter to show at that distance. And an object that large would affect every interplanetary probe we've sent out so far. It's just nonsense to think we'd have missed a body that large in the solar system.
The problematic is the brightness. In this vid it was said that the brightnes had to be decreased. The problem is that the sun is so bright that it swallows all light in its sphere of action. With the reduction of that brightness it could be possible to see nibiru. Btw: The sun is responsible why you arent able to see the stars in the sky. It is to bright^^
Originally posted by Nventual
Originally posted by Biohazard³¹³
Oh boys it's just a reflection:
Could a planet be on the terrain?
Are you kidding?! That's not the object, that's a lens flare.
The object is on the right of the sun. Look at your picture and you'll see how ignorant you now look.
Originally posted by Essan
If you look carefully you can see Nibiru's twin brother just emerging from the Sun on the other side as well
It's refraction of the bright sun due to filming through a window - though you can sometimes get similiar effects from thin, high level clouds. Sadly nothing in my library to offer as an example, but I did find a good picture of a 'double sun' here:
www.treehugger.com...
Originally posted by _Phoenix_I'm only saying it's not a lense flare. I have no theory as to what it really is, who knows!? except the video I posted about an illusion because of ice crystals in the air, which is one possibility.
This one:video.mail.ru...
[edit on 4-5-2009 by _Phoenix_]
Originally posted by redhead57
I just don't think it is sun glare or a reflection from the window. You can clearly see the thin cloud in front of the second sphere, can't see a flare having a cloud in front of it or a reflection with a cloud in front of it either.
I don't know too much about astronomy but if this thing is Niribu and it is still 3 years away, wouldn't it appear small at this time?
I don't know what that is, but I just don't think it is any of the things mentioned.
S&F
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Have you ever seen Jupiter in the night sky? How big does it appear? Bigger than the full moon? The apparent width of the "object" in the video is about 1/10th the diameter of the sun! If it's not touching the Sun, then it's on the other side of it some ways. If it's in the same orbit as Earth that would make it about the same size as the Sun. If it was in the outer solar system it would be the size of Betelgeuse.
The reason nobody's imaged Nibiru is that it IS NOT THERE.
Originally posted by _Phoenix_Uh yeah, once again I'm not sure why your directing this at me? hmmm
Originally posted by ablue07
reply to post by Essan
What about the object (if it is one) being behind the cloud? That for me is a tough one to reconcile.