So let me get this straight....

According to our President, it is ok to show flad-draped coffins from 9/11 in a campaign ad, but it is NOT ok to show flag-draped coffins arriving at Dover Air Force Base from Iraq.

Did I summarize this correctly?

Yes, you did. The hypocrisy of this administration knows no bounds and has no shame whatsoever.

Colonel, I can only hope the world is not as bleak and souless as you make it seem sometimes.

I'm sorry, KJ, but it is. It never used to be like this but, it is now. Before, everyday was happy and fun, but since 2000, it has been a dreary existence of mass murder, lies, deceit, death, unemployment skyrocketing, massive layoffs, a rise in drug use, cameras everywhere---the NEW BIg Brother, and more hate in the world. I'm sorry but its true. Its the new compassionate conservatism.

so youd rather have a president that just takes terrorist attacks sitting down, sleeps around and then lies about it? how crazy are you?

Bush's ad campaigns were offensice to me. Everything he does makes me sick, this is just another example of his hypocracy and the hypocracy of the whole administration.

Originally posted by aldsar
so youd rather have a president that just takes terrorist attacks sitting down, sleeps around and then lies about it? how crazy

are you?

And you would rather have a president that is attacked invades ANOTHER country besides the one that attacked him and ruins our econmy while building a massive deficit all the while lying through his teeth and destroying our few freedoms we have left to one that got a BJ?

I'd rather my president sleep around than do what Bush is doing. Yup. Good for Clinton, he probably could have done better, but you know, get what you can get. Yeah, I'd rather have a president who gets bjs in his spare time.

are you suggesting that clintons "economic genious" got us through the 90s?
haha that was the computer revolution, if ghw bush had still been in office it still would have happened.
and freedoms being stripped?
the fact that you are aloud to say that shows that we have more freedoms than most people in other nations, the chinese under mao couldnt even think for themselves without being brought to a "speek bitterness" meeting, people that did nothing were even persecuted so dont tell me we have no freedoms.
its morons like you that make me

Oh, yes, let us compare ourselves to the worst countries on earth for human rights as opposed to the best like the Netherlands or Switzerland. Why can't you use them as a measuring stick?

So all we have to do is stay freer than china?

I dont think thats what being free is about being the lesser slave

lol so your saying youd rather be in a country that sells drugs to its citizens to get in on the drug cartels business?

Originally posted by aldsar
lol so your saying youd rather be in a country that sells drugs to its citizens to get in on the drug cartels business?

Get in on the drug cartel business? WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? We're talking about civil rights! ARRRGGHH! This racist inuendo is real friggin annoying!

Originally posted by Amuk
And you would rather have a president that is attacked invades ANOTHER country besides the one that attacked him and ruins our econmy while building a massive deficit all the while lying through his teeth and destroying our few freedoms we have left to one that got a BJ?

since when did any country attack ours?
last time i checked al queda was not a sovereign state

lol ok ill keep it to rights then

af1, btw the pentagon released 361 photos of those killed in iraq and then didnt release anymore.

Originally posted by aldsar
Originally posted by Amuk
And you would rather have a president that is attacked invades ANOTHER country besides the one that attacked him and ruins our econmy while building a massive deficit all the while lying through his teeth and destroying our few freedoms we have left to one that got a BJ?

since when did any country attack ours?
last time i checked al queda was not a sovereign state

And was not in iraq even bush admited that

so youd rather saddam still be in power, unleashing chemical and biological attacks against his own people to perfect them to use on the free world?

Originally posted by aldsar
so youd rather saddam still be in power, unleashing chemical and biological attacks against his own people to perfect them to use on the free world?

No but are we gonna attack china too, how about North Korea? they kill there own people too along with a lot of other countries in the world including us.

What they do to there own people is none of our business.......unless of course they have oil

"We who have long enjoyed the fruits of liberty must remember that democracy faces formidable obstacles in many countries. Centuries of division and hostility -- cultural, ethnic, tribal, racial, religious, geographic -- make the rule of law difficult. Democracy requires trust between strangers, and trust cannot be earned overnight. Those of us from democracies have a great deal of work ahead of us, for we must be ready when called to action by those for whom democracy is a bold, new, exciting experiment. ... Let us not be timid in our embrace of democracy. We should be as bold and brash and brave in our democratic ideals as ever. ... The struggle for democracy does not end at the Battle of Midway, Normandy, Warsaw or Kuwait City. The struggle for freedom begins in the hearts and minds of all men and women and will not end -- must not end -- until all peoples everywhere are free." --Ronald Reagan

"The lesson of 9/11 has already been learned and a doctrine to prevent its repetition has been formulated. Without actually saying it, President Bush made it plain that as a nation, we are tired of being surprised by our enemies, over and over again. What else, after all, is the Bush doctrine of preemption? We are not, it says, going to wait around for the opportunity to turn the other cheek. If you are planning on hitting us with a surprise attack, be prepared to be surprised, yourself. ...And, then, preemption isn't much of a doctrine unless your enemies believe you mean it." --Geoffrey Norman

hows that for evidence to back up my views?
just in case you guys asked, i was being preemptive