It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of the more pervasive myths regarding “chemtrails” is that current presidential candidate Dennis Kuchinich tried to have them banned by an act of congress, but was pressured by the government to modify the act to remove the mention of “chemtrails”.
So what really happened? In a nutshell, Kucinich did not write the bill (or read it, until too late), the focus of the bill is nothing to do with chemtrails, it was written by UFO enthusiasts trying to:
1. Nullify a vast conspiracy by the “military-industrial complex”
2. Allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy
3. Avoid accidentally shooting down (or scaring away) visiting aliens.
They listed a bunch of weird weapons, including mind control, tectonic weapons and (very briefly) chemtrails. The bill was re-written several time in less unusual language to give it chance of passing, but ultimately fizzled in committee.
Originally posted by GOTZEUS
This is a pointless thread....Of course you cant debunk it....
an to say a plane can not spray chemicals into the air is just a moron....This is already MSM.
Contrails are formed when hot exhaust (comprised of water, CO2, CO and dust), from an aircraft engine condenses, causing the surrounding air to become saturated.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by WarmthofSunlight
Why would chemtrail believers even want to debunk contrail science? Sorry, but I fail to see the link, this is apples and oranges territory and this whole thread seems a bit surreal to me.
Well, most chemtrail threads consist of someone posting an image of a contrail and labelling it as a trail of chemicals released by the government. Other come on and say that its just a normal contrail. Pretty much the point of this is to see if anyone calling these trails, chemtrails, is able to debunk the science which proves that they are ordinary contrails.
Another way of looking at it is if you can disprove the science behind the formation of contrails, then maybe the chemtrail theory may seem more plausible to those of us that do not believe in them
Understand?
And yet another ozweatherman thread on the same denial of chemtrails. What are the ATS rules for posting repeat threads? this is getting ridiculous!
It's also worth noting that Germany is now admitting their programs here.. Additionally, as a previous poster noted, if this were a completely fabricated product of the internet, then why would OFFICIAL government documents refer to Chemtrails USING THAT WORD? Don't you think that's odd? I would think if something didn't exist, it wouldn't be referred to by government.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
I can say with a 100% certainty
Originally posted by watchtheashes
It's like they deliberately cross the trails to condense them into bigger clouds.
Originally posted by watchtheashes
No normal plane would follow such strange paths nor move at the speeds they do to do it.
Originally posted by watchtheashes
these are not normal maneuvers for any plane.
Originally posted by watchtheashes
When the natural clouds do come in...they look WAY different.
Originally posted by huntergatherer
Could any of you weather giants explain the black lines that you can see leading the white jets or are parallel the trails ? This phenom is rare yet happens.