It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jkrog08
I am anxious to hear how "pressure" can propagate inside a vacuum(with no pressure).I am not being sarcastic,just asking your opinion.
And to the poster on "pre-bang" physics,you are correct equations are useless at that point,that is where pure conceptual logic and,like you said,philosophy/metaphysics comes in.
About "what caused existence(OP,I bet you didnt expect this,lol.really there is no answer!).........how about a "Static Field Reality collapsing on itself due to the weight of infinite size?Now talk about mind bending?!
Originally posted by Wehali
Matter doesn't exist, has never existed and will never exist. Things such as
"the smallest particle" does not exist either. Everything is energy, vibrancy
and frequency.. basically, everything is made out of sound.
Originally posted by Wehali
Matter doesn't exist, has never existed and will never exist. Things such as
"the smallest particle" does not exist either. Everything is energy, vibrancy
and frequency.. basically, everything is made out of sound.
Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by spellbound
Don't ever let anything,science or otherwise influence your decision on God.Most mainstream theories require a God.It is now trying to describe God in science terms.I personally know there is a God,I have been many times in situations where I should have died,but didn't.Everyone has a purpose,mine is not yet fulfilled.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
Sound silly to right? Everyone wants a beginning.....
But what if there is not....what if there is always space and always dark matter and always matter. What if everything is infinite? Is this possible? If not...explain why its not. Just because we can see a point of origin where our Universe seems to of expanded from....does that really mean there wasnt space and matter before this explosion of new matter? Could there of not been a collapse of a former matter...and then it all just emanates itself back out again?
Not sure if Im making sense here....but I see no reason for a instantaneous beginning from NOTHING.....my idea of thinking is there was always something.
See I believe everything emanates from something....nothing is created form nothing. I think everything has to have something to emanate from. This just seems logical. I believe in God....but I dont need to believe that God acts in magical ways that dont have a order. I think space and elements have ALWAYS been....so help me out here if there is proof that space hasnt always been here.
LV
Originally posted by shapeless
reply to post by LeoVirgo
The word creator can be misleading for me anyways...because it begs the idea that something can come from nothing...without order...without cause and effect...and I have extreme issues with that. Just because there is a 'God' force, divine energy that is infinite ect....does not mean that God 'thinks' things into creation from nothing...I see God as more of a force that follows a natural order, like the water, winds, fire, ect....not so much a 'decider' but yet a 'filler' of al things (not saying this is what u think...but what I hear from the majority of religious folk). I think the "natural" order are programmed to do things, water, wind and fire shape things and change their compositions. Water makes things wet, penetrates things, freezes and breaks, floods, boils, steams mists, etc. It is a really good multiple purpose tool. The more forms it can take, the more tasks it can perform. In space gravity is the tool of choice (that i know about) sort of like the vacuum cleaner in the house of God. IMO the "big bang" was a "white hole", the ejecta from a black hole that has created an aneurysm in the space/time continuum. In more earthly terms, the vacuum cleaner bag burst.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by harrytuttle
So you're saying that, where science declines to tread for want of evidence as a guide to the truth, philosophy, whose 'truths' are derived from thought alone, can light the way forward?
I beg leave to doubt this.