It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JerichoRanger
FEMA Trains=Slaughter House?
The web bots prediction of a mass illness, that renders people like zombies, could be mass hunger....I know when I am hungry, I turn quite zombie-like.
ajority has focused on adverse health and environmental impact; almost none on the geo-politics of GM seeds, and particularly seeds as a weapon of mass destruction. Engdahl has addressed this issue but the crop seed is one of the many "Seeds of Destruction" in this book.
Engdahl carefully documents how the intellectual foundations of 'eugenics,' mass culling of the sick, coloured, and otherwise disposable races, were actually first established, and even legally approved, in the United States. Eugenics research was financially supported by the Rockefeller and other elite families and first tested on Jews under Nazi Germany.
It is purely by chance that world's poorest nations also happen to be best endowed with natural resources. These regions are also the ones with growing population. The fear among European ruling families, increasingly, integrating with economic and military might of the United States, was that if the poor nations became developed, the abundant natural resources, especially oil, gas, and strategic minerals and metals, may become scarcer for the white population. That situation was unacceptable to the white ruling elite.
he central question that dominated the minds of the ruling clique was population reduction in resource rich countries but the question was how to engineer mass culling all over the world without generating powerful backlash as it was bound to happen. When the US oil reserves peaked in 1972 and it became a net oil importer, the situation became alarming and the agenda took the centre stage. Kissinger, one of the key strategists of Nixon, nurtured by the Rockefellers, prepared what is known as National Security Study Memo (NSSM#200), in which he elaborated his plan for population reduction. In this Memo he specifically targets thirteen countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Turkey, Thailand, and The Phillipines.
The weapon to be used was food; even if there was a famine food would be used to leverage population reduction. Kissinger is on record for stating, "Control oil, you control nations; control food and you control the people." How a small group of key people transformed the elitist philosophy, of controlling food to control people, into realistic operational possibility within a short time is the backdrop of Engdahl's book, the central theme running from the beginning till the end with the Rockefellers and Kissinger, among others, as the key dramatis personae.
He describes how the Rockefellers guided the US agriculture policy, used their powerful tax-free foundations worldwide to train an army of bright young scientists in hitherto unknown field of microbiology. He traces how the field of Eugenics was renamed "genetics" to make it more acceptable and also to hide the real purpose. Through incremental strategic adjustments within a handful of chemical, food and seed corporations, ably supported by the key persons in key departments of the US Government, behemoths were created that could re-write the regulatory framework in nearly every country. And these seeds of destruction of carefully constructed regulatory framework- to protect the environment and human health- were sown back in the 1920s.
www.globalresearch.ca...
Originally posted by jd140
Why would they depopulate?
If something sinister like population control is going to happen, then one has to think that this has been the plan for a while now.
Wouldn't it had been easier and more low key to stunt births instead of depopulating?
I mean, if you cut births by 10 percent then there wouldn't be much inquiry on why. If you start starving people then not only would that take a long time to accomplish your goal it would raise flags that it isn't a natural process.
Preventing pregnancy seems like the common sense thing to do.
I mean, if you cut births by 10 percent then there wouldn't be much inquiry on why. If you start starving people then not only would that take a long time to accomplish your goal it would raise flags that it isn't a natural process.
Originally posted by JerichoRanger
Freaky stuff. I am a Vegan and find this really disturbing. Cannibalism is one of my darkest fears. On both ends.
I was searching for Edgar Casey predictions of cannibalism and ran across this instead.
Anyone know any other stats on cannibalism?
I live in LA and heard we would turn to cannibalism in 3 weeks if supplies stopped being brought to us. Maybe sooner.
www.worldnetdaily.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by JerichoRanger
Anyone know any other stats on cannibalism?
I live in LA and heard we would turn to cannibalism in 3 weeks if supplies stopped being brought to us.