It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TH3ON3
reply to post by LDragonFire
What's wrong with a one world government?
One is reminded of that long ago character on Saturday Night Live...The Church Lady, and how she might handle this thread, like this - Well, well, well, and what does your dragon avatar and your name mean? hmmm...could it be LUCIFER DRAGON FIRE...hmmm.
Amen sister!!!
Originally posted by Mikeyy
How can you not be afraid of a "One World Government"?
One group of people, that rule over the enter planet's population? Sounds stupid to me. We already have enough corruption in Washington, The Posible corruption this could bring would be unthinkable.
Plus if they started making such brash laws that I could no longer take it, where will I go? I can't leave. Im a.... Prisoner?
Originally posted by thewind
reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Now you see why I don't do "organized" religion! I follow Jesus, NOT MAN! If ya wanna see scriptures on the "one world gov't" look no further than revelations chapter 13, verses 3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13,14,15,16,17 and 18. NOw, how many more scriptures do ya want to see? There are more in daniel, and I think Isaiah. Stop following man and start following God!
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Religion has conditioned us that a one world government is bad, But is it?
When we watch shows like Star Trek a one world government is a good thing as we pull all our resources and our collective energies into our collective goals, there is no division between race, religion, or culture, because we cease to be Americans or Brits, or Chinese and we will become just humans or Earthlings.
I was raised to believe that a one world government would be bad because it would be the anti-Christ that will rule this world and that soon after this rule our world as we know it will end. Now after years of study, research and discussions it seems to me that this is the old way of thinking and has it's roots in racism and even nationalism.
What say you?
Originally posted by Next_Heap_With
I am not religous and do not believe in the antichrist. and i think a NWO is bad.... how do you explain that?
Now you see why I don't do "organized" religion! I follow Jesus, NOT MAN! If ya wanna see scriptures on the "one world gov't" look no further than revelations chapter 13, verses 3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13,14,15,16,17 and 18. NOw, how many more scriptures do ya want to see? There are more in daniel, and I think Isaiah. Stop following man and start following God!
Originally posted by Gorman91
that was with regards to evil leaders, IE, Nero.
It is not suppose to be all governments.
It states that all forms of organization, regardless of how democratic or autocratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop into oligarchies.
Of course they dont preach or teach that in church ...they also quit teaching preaching end times events ...I have friends who attend church two or three times a week and get downright mad if I even mention anything end time related .. So wonder why that is ..Since it is ALL IN THE BIBLE >...because mainline churchs are full of WOLVES and they want you all in the dark as does satan who is in alot of those men who run the churchs .....those wolves are in sheeps clothing and when the thief comes to steal and kill and destroy ..you wont have any warning ..because you did not pay attention to what was happening around you ,...(like the signs of the times ..which Jesus spoke of so many times it was unreal ) .................
i. The preterist: that it describes in veiled language events of John's own time, and until the end of the Roman empire or at least the conversion of Constantine. This has the disadvantage in that it is only meaningful then but to us it is not as relevant. The beast is seen as only the Roman empire and Babylon is Rome, however there are clear references to the Rome of John's time and it is helpful to know the circumstances of Johns time in interpreting the book. In Rev 1: 11 John is told "Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea." hence in some ways it is similar to Paul's letters to the Romans, Corinthians, Colossians, Ephesians and Thessalonians. In both John's and Paul's letters God has chosen these to be preserved for His church throughout the centuries. Just as the letter to the Corinthians addresses specific problems they had then it also deals with these problems for future centuries. In the same way Revelation deals with the problems faced by the seven churches in Asia, but it also has a great deal to say to future generations. Because John uses symbolic imagery Revelation is not tied down to only the Roman empire but may also be used to described successive persecuting tyrannies down through the centuries. The next three methods of interpretation deal with the value of Revelation to future generations in different ways.
ii. The historicist: that it is a chart of the whole of history from Christ's first coming to his second, and beyond. In this method people will try to make sections of Revelation fit in with specific historical events. The beast is seen as the current manifestation of the beast such as the papacy in the time of the reformation. This position is untenable because there will be a wide variation of interpretations through the ages. But because the principles are valid to all generations, as the idealist would suggest, each generation should be able to identify the characters portrayed by Revelation. Therefore the historicists view should not be disparaged, it has provided comfort in times of persecution throughout church history. The most important of the historical interpretation from the 12th century to reformation times makes the papacy the beast and Rome or the Roman church is Babylon. However to make Revelation a chart of the whole of human history and therefore to use it to predict when the end will come is wrong and is not how John intended Revelation to be read, but to use it to strengthen God's people undergoing particular trials is a valid use.
iii. The idealist: that between messages for the first century and prophecies of the far future it deals chiefly with principles that are always valid in Christian experience. The beast is the Roman empire of John's day but also a succession of ungodly empires leading to the last empire from which the antichrist will come. Because Christians have been persecuted throughout the generations, each generation should be able to identify who their beast is.
iv. The futurist: that it is largely a prophecy of events still to come, especially just prior to the return of Christ. This is the normal interpretation of someone reading the book for the first time because its imagery looks so fantastic. It means that the book will be especially relevant for those in the last generation. The beast is seen as the antichrist who emerges from a revived Roman empire. It is clear that the second coming features prominently throughout the book and therefore there is truth in the futurist view, but this view tends to overlook spiritual truth that is of value today. However note that John is told not to seal up the book (Rev 22:10) because the time is near, although Daniel was told to seal up the vision until the end times (Dan 12:4), this means that the book is about to start its fulfilment. The book of Revelation was written initially to the seven churches in Asia, and hence the preterist view. However the book will reach it final fulfilment when the last antichrist appears and Christ returns this is the futurist view. Ladd divides the futurist views into two kinds, the moderate and the extreme view known as dispensationalism. The latter makes a sharp distinction between Israel and the church, the letters to the seven churches deal with seven ages of church history, chapter 7 onwards concerns Israel because the church has been raptured by this point so that it does not suffer in the great tribulation which occurs during the last 3 and a half years of history. This view is widely held in America, the best exponent of this view is Walvoord.