Federal Lawsuit Filed Against Janet Napolitano and Homeland Security!

Not to be confused with Johnette Napolitano lead singer of Concrete Blonde, even tho she is clearly a better choice!!!!!!!!

reply to post by Electricgypsy


Wow that gives me an idea. What if we only allow Rock Stars to run the government. We could have Axl Rose as President. I bet nobody would screw with us then.

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama..... it doesn't really matter who commissioned the report in my opinion. The fact of the matter is we allow 500 people entirely too much control of our lives. To say that we outnumber them is a vast understatement. How do so few people control so many people?

Part of the population doesn't care, part of the population says you can't stop it, so don't try and the rest of the population is too busy working their rears off to make ends meet to keep up with what is going on.

I must fall into the terrorist category because I am disallusioned with the entire world as it stands. But don't make waves cause you might tick off your neighbors or spouse. I've lost the point of the thread now.

Viva la revolucion!

reply to post by TheAgentNineteen


Amen to that, the women have no clue what in the heck her job is and what she was appointed in that seat to do.

She is not qualify for the job and she is actually a kiss butt to illegal immigration, can you believe that, her ties to illegal immigration groups tells her true agenda.

Tag American patriots terrorist while favoring illegal immigration unbelievable.

This woman has to go!!!!!!

My husband and the base where he works at with nothing but majority veterans and military retirees were up in arms after finding out what homeland of the deceiving has been wasting time under this woman charge.

I guess they don't have anything better to do.

Taking into consideration that the state of the nation is in such a mess right now what else but target veterans in the nation that most are gun owners and are trained in combat, a treat to the powers in government indeed.

And now they want to make them angry.

The kind of morons in charge of places of power in our nations is just staggering.

I see a wholesale plan to repeal the constitution by claiming a insurrection by right-wing groups.

This way they can make laws that are in direct violation of the constitution.

They are already running a propaganda campaign to ban guns with this campaign that 95% of the illegal guns in Mexico come from the US
this has already been proven to be false.
www.foxnews.com...

Repeatedly the people in the US have called for strict border controls and the deportation of illegals. and the Obama wants to legalize the illegals and let more in. This will mean more legalized illegal immigrants that will buy guns and pass them to there relatives in Mexico.

This is where most of the 17% of illegal guns from the US get into Mexico.
not for the cartels but for the people in Mexico to protect themselves from the cartels and there corrupt mexican government.

I know a few legal immigrant from Mexico the say if you have the money you can get a gun in Mexico all you have to do is buy it from a corrupt mexican cop. They sell them to the upper class in Mexico.

There is a long list of other laws that the Obama administration wants to change just as soon as the can invalidate the constitution.

And they have started a major propaganda campaign to make it look like the people in the US want it.
and then they can ignore the real wishes of the people.

Watch the next year. They will start using fake or misleading polls to try to push there agenda. They can use and distort any polls and will just like they distort the illegal guns in Mexico coming from the US.

You know you have a problem when the government uses such out right lies and keeps using them even when they are proven wrong.

They will brand any groups that disagrees with them as right wing hate/terrorist/racist ETC ETC ETC just so they can ignore or silents them.

They will use the global warming scare to rise money for this campaign by taxing those that disagree with there program a lot more then those that go along with the program.

Start watching for the illegal acts by people in the administration once they find out just how much power they have and how the administration and congress can block any investigation into illegal acts.

I don't think this report was released by accident. Quite the contrary. I believe, if I am not mistaken, it was either the day before or the day of the Tea Parties.

My husband downloaded a copy of the thing from Michelle Malkins website.

If you want to know what we are REALLY up against I suggest you do the same thing.

The average US citizen, who loves the country and wants to uphold the constitution is now being referred to as "A right wing extremist."

Until I read this I didn't believe in the "camps." Now I do think it's a very real possibility.

That was an attempt, IMHO, to shut us up. These people like Napalitano will do anything to grab power. JMHO.

Be afraid...be very afraid.

Just curious, but where is the ACLU? I mean, aren't there a group of people being unfairly labeled? Why aren't they shouting from the rooftops, planning marches, demonstrations, etc.?
Terrorists aren't terrorists anymore.

But vets are.

It'll be interesting, I'm going to Fort Campbell in KY for two weeks, I'll ask the members of the 101st Airborne how THEY feel being labeled as such.

Maybe the ACLU can then get. . I mean THEN the ACLU can defend the military. . uh. . I mean the ACLU can defend people who support the Second Ammendment. .

oh hell
I can't even type that with a straight face!

Originally posted by ANNED
I see a wholesale plan to repeal the constitution by claiming a insurrection by right-wing groups.

This way they can make laws that are in direct violation of the constitution.
...............

They already tried to change the Constitution of the United States, and they did it under the table. We only found out when we were 2 states away from voting away the United States Constitution by way of a Constitutional Convention, and in which it clearly even stated that if TPTB changed other parts of the Constitution which were not refered in the Conventional documents, that delegates could not vote for or against such changes, and they could only vote for what was on the paper.

We were TWO STATES AWAY from losing the United States Constitution, and if it wasn't by some people who noticed what was happening we would now have a very different United States Constitution.

A public policy organization has issued an urgent alert stating affirmative votes are needed from only two more states before a Constitutional Convention could be assembled in which "today's corrupt politicians and judges" could formally change the U.S. Constitution's "'problematic' provisions to reflect the philosophical and social mores of our contemporary society."

"Don't for one second doubt that delegates to a Con Con wouldn't revise the First Amendment into a government-controlled privilege, replace the 2nd Amendment with a 'collective' right to self-defense, and abolish the 4th, 5th, and 10th Amendments, and the rest of the Bill of Rights," said the warning from the American Policy Center.

"Additions could include the non-existent separation of church and state, the 'right' to abortion and euthanasia, and much, much more," the group said.

The warning comes at a time when Barack Obama, who is to be voted the next president by the Electoral College Monday, has expressed his belief the U.S. Constitution needs to be interpreted through the lens of current events.

Tom DeWeese, who runs the center and its education and grassroots work, told WND the possibilities stunned him when he discovered lawmakers in Ohio are considering a call for a Constitutional Convention. He explained that 32 other states already have taken that vote, and only one more would be needed to require Congress to name convention delegates who then would have more power than Congress itself.

www.worldnetdaily.com...

BTW WND from time to time does a very good job in finding issues such as this. (This is to those who like to bash at news media such as WND even though it has made public some very important issues such as the Constitutional Convention that was about to be passed)

Anyway, as to this woman, she should be criminally charged for this, and this DHS document should be made public with no excuses about National Security.. claiming that regular law abiding citizens are criminals because of their belief in the U.S. Constitution is clearly an act of treason by a U.S. official.

reply to post by MsBehavin1


You are correct! It was released beforehand, in my opinion, to try and shut down the Tea Parties or at least to discredit them before they even got started.

I will look at Michelle Malkin's web site and try to read the whole thing; thanks for the info!

Originally posted by booky
I guess they will try to put me in the same fema camp with djzombie..It is could to here there are many americans that are ready to stand up to the federal BS..Hope the Tea party movment gets bigger with more steam..it is way over due.

The FEMA camps are so 2000ish. The new rage may be the bird flu. They want to kill us, but they want it to look like an "act of God".

Originally posted by son of PC

Originally posted by booky
I guess they will try to put me in the same fema camp with djzombie..It is could to here there are many americans that are ready to stand up to the federal BS..Hope the Tea party movment gets bigger with more steam..it is way over due.

The FEMA camps are so 2000ish. The new rage may be the bird flu. They want to kill us, but they want it to look like an "act of God".

If it's an act of god, wouldn't that mean Obama did it?

Americans should be paying attention at one specific claim by the DHS, and Janet Stupidlano, I mean Napolitano, in which they state, and I quote:

Fear of Communist regimes

With all the Socialists programs being implemented, and statements such as this from the DHS, Americans should be aware on what this Republic is being turned into.

[edit on 17-4-2009 by ElectricUniverse]

reply to post by ElectricUniverse


The problem is that we are outnumbered by the Americans who are not paying attention and they keep letting the same politicians in office over and over again. And when you try to inform people of what is going on they look at you like you should be in a straight jacket.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ZindoDoone

 

In your research, Zindo, did you happen to run across any mention of former heads of the DHS under Fmr. Pres. Bush?

I heard, somewhere (was it Fox News???....nah!) that a very similar statement came out of the DHS in September 2008.

Really, to be 'fair and balanced' it's worth a look, just in case.

[edit on 4/17/0909 by weedwhacker]

Well, the administration you seem to support and defend (no matter what they do) could have easily lived up to their campaign "promises" and said "no way!" to issuing this report to LEO's around the country.

Right?????

But what do they do instead? Expand on and actually implement the taking away of our rights.

Remember, lefties, that for all your shrillness during the Bush administration, not one of you was branded a terrorist in any official document released to LEO's nationwide. Not one.

[edit on 4/17/2009 by centurion1211]

Originally posted by mikerussellus
Just curious, but where is the ACLU? I mean, aren't there a group of people being unfairly labeled? Why aren't they shouting from the rooftops, planning marches, demonstrations, etc.?

The ACLU is so left-leaning that they no doubt are charter obamaphiles. As such, you cannot expect them to raise a finger or even a peep about something the obama administration does - no matter who it hurts.

reply to post by centurion1211


I think Mike's reply was tongue in cheek and spot on. If these idiots in the ACLU where realy Americans instead of devout Socialists they could actualy be An American Civil Liberies Organization!! But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, not these folks who's founders where the worst of the progressives then and the members now are the worst of the movement that seeks to disembowl our Constitution!!

Zindo

Originally posted by centurion1211


The ACLU is so left-leaning that they no doubt are charter obamaphiles. As such, you cannot expect them to raise a finger or even a peep about something the obama administration does - no matter who it hurts.

I totally agree. They spend more time trying to get joe sexoffender off than worrying about ALL of our civil liberties. They are a joke.

Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by whoshotJR

 

That is true that it was commisioned by the Bush HSA.

Yes but that point has gone largely ignored by some "media" outlets bent on putting the blame on the "liberal" Obama administration. FOX in particular (along with a group of conservative talk shows hosts) has been pushing this story as a liberal attack on freedom when they left out the point that it ALSO targeted "left wing" groups as well.

Obama Fails to Stop Bush Era Targeting of Veterans

Some of the Fox talking heads even expressed wonder at how the president could have moved so quickly to launch his attacks on the free speech of conservatives and virtuous Right wing Americans. Unfortunately, one of their reporters reads too much and committed a moment of accidental journalism before the cameras cut away.

"This is an element of the story which went largely unreported. There were two assessments, one focusing on left wing groups and one which focuses on right wing groups. Both were requested by the Bush administration, but not finished until President Bush left office." The Moderate Voice

I think this is nothing but political manipulation and fear mongering.

It seems to be working on those eager to find something to be outraged about with no regard for the facts thanks to the unscrupulous and inept news sources they choose to rely on. Janet Ann Napolitano assumed the role of Secretary of Homeland Security in late January. The first woman to do so.

How is she responsible?
She didn't stop it fast enough?

They are suing the wrong person.

Yet another FOX news win against common sense and rational thinking.

- Lee

reply to post by lee anoma


When promoted to any job with more responsibility and you are Number One in the job, its yourbutt that is on the line. If her subordinates didn't inform her what kind of high visability, very sensitive information, was in this report its her problem. I also understand that this was leaked and that in itself is enough to call her the responsible party! As with many in this administration..and others.. political cronyism and payback is what drives the media and what they are given to report. I find it very interesting that with the slant most put on the media that this came out as it did. Still, fact is, she's on the hot seat and she is not capable of handling the fall out. She should resign and put someone with no axe to grind or let someone else grind their axes in his or her house! An organization with the perview this one has should not need or allow political leanings to guide its use. Its a much too sensitive office to play games with in this day and age!

Zindo

Originally posted by centurion1211

Remember, lefties, that for all your shrillness during the Bush administration, not one of you was branded a terrorist in any official document released to LEO's nationwide. Not one.

[edit on 4/17/2009 by centurion1211]

That is because you forget that under Bush secrecy was Bush motto and we know how he rewarded those that leaked information.