It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
I don't see any reasonable need for ordinary citizens to start wearing body armour in public.
Originally posted by Agent Styx
Fight over urinating dog got police to ambush
www.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Poplawski was also charged with possessing an instrument of crime: the bulletproof vest he wore during the gun battle with police. The criminal complaint does not say how Poplawski obtained the vest.
Mod edit: moved to forum where thread title is member's decision.
[edit on 4/5/2009 by JacKatMtn]
Originally posted by mdiinican
reply to post by Dramey
Well, it's more a case of the government not wanting people to get their hands on the particular model of armor vest that they use, so that they can know when a soldier has stolen one or illegally sold one off. You can buy level III soft armor, and you can buy the plates that bring it up to level IV. You just can't get the particular brand of IOTV that they use.
As a civilian, you can even order that dragon skin armor everyone's all worked up. Of course, in the same size, for the same level of protection, it weighs even more than a standard vest. But that's the price you pay for comfort, form fitting hard armor, and slightly better multi-hit survivability
Also, to be fair, the military style vests that can actually stop rifle fire are bulky and weigh about 18-25+ pounds, and only do so on an an ~11x14 (for large) area on the front and back of the chest, with optional add-ons for a bit of the sides. That's really not something anyone is going to wear without living in constant real danger
[edit on 28-1-2010 by mdiinican]
Originally posted by brainwrek
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
I don't see any reasonable need for ordinary citizens to start wearing body armour in public.
I guess that settles it. Since you dont see the need, people shouldnt be allowed to own kevlar.
How about those who may need it that arent cops?
Executive protection personnel?
Armored car drivers?
How about those freedom loving individuals who want to own one simply because they can?