It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wheresthetruth
I dont remember history proclaiming the militant revolutionaries as murderous thugs. Perhaps the Brits called them something along those lines when it all began, but that didnt last long.
V for Vendetta. The destruction of private and public property, taking by force of privately owned business, holding hostage the employees of said business, calling out and attack on the heads of government.
Do you call that terrorism? Do you call that liberation? Is it heroic or demonic? Is it sane bravery or suicidal psychopathic behaviour?
The answers are clear. Only history will decide. In the present and looking to the future, it will be determined to be the most vile. However, if the outcome is favorable and the event is infamous, then history will maintain its defining moment in glory.
Standing up now only pays off in the long term. If you choose to stand up against the villains that seat themselves in power, you should also be willing to pay the ultimate price and see your life ruined or taken from you in near term.
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
So when one decides to act is he a terroist or a hero ? Was Tim McVay fighting for our rights ?
Actually I think he was the scape goat wasent he ? I haven't done any research on the Oklahoma City
bombing, but with everyting else that has happened , I think I need to go back and take a look.
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
Violence against inocent people is not an act of revolution PERIOD. Under no circumstances should inocent people be put in harms way to prove a point or further a cause. That would be defined as terrorism not patriotism.
Originally posted by rko_radio
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
So when one decides to act is he a terroist or a hero ? Was Tim McVay fighting for our rights ?
Actually I think he was the scape goat wasent he ? I haven't done any research on the Oklahoma City
bombing, but with everyting else that has happened , I think I need to go back and take a look.
It's been awhile since I looked over the Oklahoma City bombing. Without going into lengthy research again, I'll just say that I believe the US govt was behind it.
McVeigh supposedly wrote his sister that he had joined a special ops branch of uncle sugars forces. He was also filmed in army uniform, on an army base, working on an APC, supposedly after he had been discharged.
"Local" media coverage from Ok City supposedly said that multiple devices were found and several of them did not go off. There are scores of other anomalies to this event.
This bombing reeks to high heaven, just like the 1993 WTC bombing.
[edit on 2-4-2009 by rko_radio]
Originally posted by LOBO
Originally posted by rko_radio
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
So when one decides to act is he a terroist or a hero ? Was Tim McVay fighting for our rights ?
Actually I think he was the scape goat wasent he ? I haven't done any research on the Oklahoma City
bombing, but with everyting else that has happened , I think I need to go back and take a look.
It's been awhile since I looked over the Oklahoma City bombing. Without going into lengthy research again, I'll just say that I believe the US govt was behind it.
McVeigh supposedly wrote his sister that he had joined a special ops branch of uncle sugars forces. He was also filmed in army uniform, on an army base, working on an APC, supposedly after he had been discharged.
"Local" media coverage from Ok City supposedly said that multiple devices were found and several of them did not go off. There are scores of other anomalies to this event.
This bombing reeks to high heaven, just like the 1993 WTC bombing.
[edit on 2-4-2009 by rko_radio]
I actually have some of the original local news coverage for the Oklahoma CIty bombing; their original suspects were three Arabic men driving a white pickup north on I-35. They picked up one white male driving a yellow Mercury Marquis.
Ahem?
In 2007, Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols claimed that a high-ranking FBI director, Larry Potts, directed Timothy McVeigh in the plot to blow up a government building and might have changed the original target of the attack, according to a new affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Utah on February 9, 2007. Nichols also claimed that the government was protecting the official and other conspirators "in a cover-up to escape its responsibility" for the attacks.