Why can't they find a cure for cancer?

After reading the post explaining what is likely the cause for graying hair, I asked myself--after another ATS user alluded to it--why haven't they found a cure for cancer yet? I mean, we have treatments for some; we have vaccines for others, but why not one overall, broad-sweeping method of complete eradication? Could it be that it is being suppressed? It makes sense. Pharmaceutical companies and the health care infrastructure have nothing to gain and everything to lose if they suddenly announced all forms of cancer can be cured without exception. Just some food for thought. Any opinions are welcome.

reply to post by se7en30


Because the pharmacutical companies wouldnt make any money if they found cures for any diseases.......

Maybe this can cure cancer - www.projectcamelot.org...

[edit on 31/3/2009 by davidifty]

reply to post by davidifty

Yeah, I touched on the very idea in my initial post...great minds think alike huh? Thanks for your input.

If you believe this:
www.cheniere.org...

They already have!

There is already a cure for cancer and many other diseases. The cures aren't being put out because pharmacutical companies wouldn't make any money and neither would the researchers....well the so call researchers.

They've cured cancer years ago IMO.

There simply isn't any money in a drug that "cures" people. Pharmaceutical companies want their clients to continue using their medications.

There is only money in treatment when it comes to drugs. Besides they wouln't be able to justify making it really expensive even if they did release the "cure" to the g eneral population.

THey would all go out of business. Not to mention all of the Cancer research foundations and treatment centers. All of those would be closed.

No money, no cure.

~Keeper

yeah this one always brings me to aids lol how they infected the monkeys in africa or sometin which infected the [population], im sure population control is being done if not market control through this and yeah the cure for cancer is found but how would they make money off of kimo therapy and other cancer fighting products with that?



Racist word removed

Terms And Conditions Of Use

2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.

[edit on 31/3/09 by masqua]

reply to post by cbianchi513

Wow! Excellent article and information. Now if we can only get that sucker set up here in America I can go on chewing tobacco worry-free
. Thanks for the post.

reply to post by tothetenthpower

I am thinking along your lines as well--as mentioned in my original post. It makes me sad when you consider how many lives would be saved by a publicly and mass distributed cure. It really ticks me off that some people hold the power to play god.

Realistically, there probably isn't just one single cure for "cancer" since cancer is a general catch-all term for numerous types of, well, cancerous afflictions.

For the same reason that we can't use a single drug to get rid of all viruses, a single drug for all bacteria, a single cure for for all pathogens, different types of cancers will very likely end up having very different cures.

And considering that the majority of the cancers that exist are simply unrestrained natural processes of the body (cellular growth and division), any catch-all fix that prevents that will also prevent our bodies from recovering from a simple scrape or paper cut, and would stop our bodies from growing. If the process of cellular division were stopped completely, our bodies would end up breaking down and decaying in a fairly short amount of time.

I should note that methods already exist to cause cell division to stop, but these methods cannot yet be localized; they are not advanced enough yet and affect the entire body, not simply an individual part.

Simply stating, anything that affects a cancerous cell is going to affect every type of cell, regardless as to whether or not it is a cancer cell.

It's just another example of the rules of commerce: Cancer research is a booming industry. The med center up the road just built/still building a multi million dollar cancer treatment and research center. You should see it, it's massive!

www.hmc.psu.edu...

Considering the construction provided my family with income at the time, I'm not complaining. Too bad they couldn't double the size, I say! (Laid off malcontented rantings...)

Look at the numbers that went into building just this one facility!

I need to rethink my carreer path, and become a cancer researcher!

On another note, that link I provided for Priore's machine is really old. I found that in '04 or so, so it's hardly new. It does merit some attention, but I am no EE, so I can't really understand the workings. It sounds pretty anyway, hehe. (Pinching a dip of Skoal straight into lower lip...)

[edit on 31/3/09 by cbianchi513]

If you believe that they've not found a cure for all these deseases, then you're not a proper conspiracy theorist. Please leave you badge, pen and tin foil hat at the reception on the way out. Thank you.

I have a friend who works full time for the Charity ' Cancer Research ' in the UK. She says that it is run as a business and only around 10% of it's takings actually go to research, the rest being swallowed up by administration, so I don't suppose that they would be happy with a cure either.

Hi, cancer hunters.

Here are sites with good info:

THC (marijuana) helps cure cancer says Harvard study.
www.nowpublic.com...

And another alternative:

Phoenix Tears, a not for profit entity dedicated to Hemp medicines.
www.phoenixtears.ca...

Blue skies.

reply to post by se7en30

They have found ways to make cancer go dormant by inhibiting
the enzyme that allows it grow without oxygen.

Also known as the Warburg Hypothesis.

Warburg Hypothesis

The solution research was done at the Picower Institute
back in the late 90's.

All of it has been pulled off the web and hidden neatly away.

This is the only small mention of similar research that still can
be found on the web, and I suspect it will be gone soon.

Enzyme based cancer killer

There is FAR too much money to be made in treatment.

Besides it would violate rule #1 !

Rule #1 says 500 million ppl max on earth

Good Luck to all the good ppl !

[edit on 31-3-2009 by Ex_MislTech]

reply to post by Ex_MislTech

Thanks for the post...great information!

Dr Royal Rife had the cure in 1950.

Thanks to the USFDA, his research and microscopes have been mostly destroyed or stored away to be used by selected people. He was labeled as a fraud by the US Govt.

I know many people who have extended their time line by treating themselves with parasite cleansing programs.

I am one of those people who has cheated the grim reaper.

The drug company is sad that my prescriptions for several hundred dollars of white man's medicine per month has been cut way back. I am not in the clear yet, after 2 years of parasite elimination. I think Dr Rife's machine would have been quicker that herbs.

Or possibly the Egyptians had a good way to treat parasites.

the light bulb

[edit on 31-3-2009 by win 52]

It would be good for a single pharmaceutical company if they where the first to release the cure. They would profit off the machines and put their competitors out of business therefore giving them a monopoly over the industry.

The amount of money that would be lost by the pharma co's and the medical profession would be astronomical if cancer were curable.

alas, according to a documentary "The Beautiful Truth" (which I watched last night) the cure for cancer was announced in the 30's by Dr. Gerson who published his findings only to be murdered by poison. It's an interesting movie (I watched it via netflix online) apparently people are being cured (in mexico) by this therapy as we speak. I wish I would have run across this 2 years ago before I lost my father to cancer.

The Beautiful Truth

worth a watch