It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
FRENCH President Nicolas Sarkozy has threatened to walk out of the G20 summit in London if leaders of the world's biggest economies fail to commit to introducing tougher financial regulations.
France and Germany both want the talks on Thursday to focus on the need for new rules for the financial services industry in an attempt to avoid a repeat of the current credit crunch.
Mr Sarkozy also wants a global financial regulator, something which has been opposed by the summit's host British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US President Barack Obama.
Britain and the US believe countries instead need to focus on increasing public spending to help drive economic growth.
Any walk-out by the French President would cause major embarrassment for Mr Brown and Mr Obama, who hopes the talks will create a pathway to recovery for the global economy.
But Mr Sarkozy's deputy chief of staff for economic affairs Xavier Musca said the French President was prepared to walk away from the talks if the summit produces a "false success with language that sounds good but contains no commitments''.
"A basic rule with nuclear deterrence is that you do not say at what point you will use the weapon,'' Mr Musca told The Times newspaper.
Mr Sarkozy also wants a global financial regulator, something which has been opposed by the summit's host British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US President Barack Obama.
Originally posted by rattan1
This G20 summit is a total catastrophe. We expected a united stand against the current crisis and all we get is the start of a blame game. This summit was previously a gathering of finance ministers from the 20 countries and now you have the leaders of the countries gathering. Please let the professionals do their work. Politicians are hopeless. The French president may be right regarding having a global financial regulator but then blaming this crisis on the Anglo Saxons is lame......
Originally posted by rattan1
French leader threatens G20 walkout and blame "Anglo-Saxons'' for causing the economic crisis
www.news.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
FRENCH President Nicolas Sarkozy has threatened to walk out of the G20 summit in London if leaders of the world's biggest economies fail to commit to introducing tougher financial regulations.
France and Germany both want the talks on Thursday to focus on the need for new rules for the financial services industry in an attempt to avoid a repeat of the current credit crunch.
Mr Sarkozy also wants a global financial regulator, something which has been opposed by the summit's host British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US President Barack Obama.
Britain and the US believe countries instead need to focus on increasing public spending to help drive economic growth.
Any walk-out by the French President would cause major embarrassment for Mr Brown and Mr Obama, who hopes the talks will create a pathway to recovery for the global economy.
But Mr Sarkozy's deputy chief of staff for economic affairs Xavier Musca said the French President was prepared to walk away from the talks if the summit produces a "false success with language that sounds good but contains no commitments''.
"A basic rule with nuclear deterrence is that you do not say at what point you will use the weapon,'' Mr Musca told The Times newspaper.
Originally posted by Dorfl
It looks like the Eurozone countries are distancing themselves from the UK and the US. I wonder what will happen if the Eurozone, Chinese and Russians would just go ahead and create a basket currency as a new global reserve currency.
Would the US and UK be in a position to do anything to counter it? I doubt that the OPEC countries would mind a new global currency. And the US don't have many allies that would like to link their economic future to the dollar at the moment.
Another thing...I can understand that the US is against a global regulator. They can't even audit the Fed at the moment. So in effect they can't comply with any regulation a third party would impose.
But the UK? Why are they against tougher financial regulations? What have they been doing lately? Does anyone know if the UK started printing money just like the FED?
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
"Anglo-Saxons"? What's the date on this news story? 31st March 650 AD?
Whilst I can understand some desire for France to distance themselves from Britain or America, but what a ridiculous way of phrasing this. If the French do place any weight on 'displacement' or 'conquest' theories, aren't they familiar with the Vikings or the Norman Invasion? You know, the things that superseded the previous Anglo-Saxon invasion? If you want to support a particular approach to history, you can't be selective about it, Sarkozy.
Also, I love the idea of Americans being Anglo-Saxon considering half of them claim to be related to either Brian Boru or William Wallace and the rest can point out that they've either got First Nation blood in them or their Swedish grandmother still can't speak a word of English but makes beautiful pannkakor.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Good. This meeting needs to fail. France and Germany needs to say NO to the anglo-saxon empire. Anglo-saxon empire refers to UK and US.
Obama and Brown can go touch each other in the G20 restrooms.
[edit on 31-3-2009 by Vitchilo]
Seeing as the Frenchies are blaming us 'Anglo-Saxons' for the economic crisis and if he walks away, I think we in the UK should block up the channel tunnel and let them keep all the immigrants that make their way through France to the UK, as a reprisal.
Before the late 20th century it was thought that the Saxon migration was extensive, and that the previous inhabitants of Britain had either fled to Wales, Cornwall, and Scotland (the areas known as the "Celtic fringe") or had been killed. However, a consensus arose among historians in the late 20th century that the migration had been only of the elites - the only persons considered worth mentioning in most ancient histories - and that the common people did not flee; the existence of the Celtic fringe was therefore thought not to be caused by the Celts fleeing there but by the Saxon elite (and therefore Saxon culture) not reaching those areas. Recent genetic testing has suggested that the native English are genetically nearly identical to the Scots, Irish, and Welsh, and that a Saxon elite merely replaced a Celtic elite, leaving the common people (who were mainly of pre-Celtic ancestry) alone for the most part.[9] It may therefore be misleading to consider the Saxons as the "ancestors of the English" or to overemphasize the genetic differences (as opposed to cultural differences) between various areas of the British Isles.
en.wikipedia.org...