It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DataWraith
After looking at the picture, I have to say that I don't find anything MENACING about them?
I did find the scot giving the V sign menacing though, he really scared me ( he looked a bit 'alien-like' with his blurry face), but the 'UFO's' didn't.
What is it that makes them menacing anyway?, perhaps the paper could explain it to me.
Besides if they're in the east end of London , I'm surprised they didn't get their UFO hubcaps stolen.
[edit on 30/3/09 by DataWraith]
Originally posted by danj3ris
I'm not a fan of how the picture gets blurry as your eyes follow the pole upwards towards the objects in question. Take a look at the larger picture provided in the original link, and then the zoomed in one
Below the lowest object in BOTH images you can see the horizontal line on the pole just to the left of them, where things "coincidentally" happen to get blurry.
It doesn't sit right with me that any supposed pilots of these objects, would know exactly where to fly in the sky, to appear just above the "blur" line, just in case they were captured in some image.
This story stinks and I thank you for posting it.
Edit to add: I'll say this as well. Had The Register cropped the zoomed-in image to not include the clear portion of the pole, this could have been slightly more believable.
[edit on 30-3-2009 by danj3ris]
[edit on 30-3-2009 by danj3ris]
Originally posted by Shuzitzu
Still .. even with the second picture it looks like the red arrows... they've banked right in formation .. broke formation continuing straight..
Originally posted by venividivici
Nothing to see here . It is a hoax