It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xpert11
The idea of any kind of after life gives people comfort in times of grief or when they face the prospect of losing a loved one . However just like the existence of a higher power an afterlife including variations such as reincarnation is an fictional idea created by people that has been sold as truth .
Cheers xpert11 .
Originally posted by badmedia
Actually, I think what you've said is what has been "sold as truth". You couldn't possibly know that as fact, because the very act of even "knowing" anything beyond death in itself constitutes life after death.
If I were someone who had done things like Hitler for example, I think I'd be a bit more comfortable thinking nothing was going to happen after death than thinking I might have to answer to a greater authority about what I had done.
But all in all, you exhibit the classic problem with those who believe like you do. You view yourselves not as consciousness/soul, but as a physical body. And as such, you can't possibly imagine anything that doesn't involve that physical body. Sad really.
Originally posted by xpert11
Well based on the facts available it is only reasonable to conclude that claims concerning the existence of an afterlife e.t.c are false .
Hitler was a Catholic so it is unlikely that he didn't think about an after life . Terrorist organizations use the idea of an after life to recruit suicide bombers . On the whole your argument simply doesnt work .
Another false hood I don't deny the existence of Gravity for example. It just so happens that I don't support wild claims that are not backed up by any evidence . As for the rest you have completely lost me .
Thinking is often casual or routine, whereas critical thinking deliberately evaluates the quality of thinking. In a seminal study on critical thinking and education in 1941, Edward Glaser writes that the ability to think critically involves three things:[4]
1. An attitude of being disposed to consider in a thoughtful way the problems and subjects that come within the range of one's experiences,
2. Knowledge of the methods of logical inquiry and reasoning,
3. Some skill in applying those methods.
The idea of any kind of after life gives people comfort in times of grief or when they face the prospect of losing a loved one .
Critical thinking gives due consideration to the evidence, the context of judgment, the relevant criteria for making the judgment well, the applicable methods or techniques for forming the judgment, and the applicable theoretical constructs for understanding the nature of the problem
Originally posted by xpert11
There is no evidence in the first place to base any theory on !
So all the rest is redundant. You don't seem to grasp that the fact that I am not dealing in absolutes .
Look let me try and explain this better .
Person A " Mr X committed such and such a crime . "
Person B " There is no evidence to point to Mr X committing the crime ."
Sure its possible that Mr X committed the crime in question but there is no reason to think so based on the lack evidence available . Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof . When the people who make such extraordinary claims aren't taken seriously because they fail to back up there claims with any evidence , they get there knickers in a twist .
The same goes for the existence of a higher power or gods . You claimed as I understand that either yourself or other people find that the thought of an afterlife makes them think twice about there actions . Then you used Hitler as an example of someone who could have benefited from such an idea .
I pointed out that wasn't the case with Hitler . What you fail to grasp is that the Nazis were so convinced that they were doing the right thing that any thoughts of facing some kind of punishment in an afterlife wouldn't have entered there heads . Umm belief in an afterlife and religion aren't mutually exclusive .
I never said that people who believe in an afterlife are dumb . You are putting words in my mouth or just following the same old script regardless of how the discussion goes . I have found that people who argue on the side of faith tend to do this . I am fully of the school of thought that your neighbor is more important then your TV such ideas have nothing to do wild claims that are made from some quarters .
Originally posted by babloyi
But given that there is no such thing as ghosts, and that people can't communicate from the afterlife (unless you believe in seances), what sort of 'signs' are you expecting to see?
And be honest with yourself, do you really believe that there is ANYTHING you could possibly see that you wouldn't 'explain away' for your own comfort?
I mean, it is like those rebuttals to UFO sightings. While I personally don't believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life, some of the explanations some people come up with to give rebuttals are hilariously out there...I mean, anything goes as long as it is not 'aliens':
Originally posted by badmedia
If you told someone about it, and told them what you knew and they asked for proof what would you say?