UFO Primetime: NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film

Originally posted by RFBurns

Originally posted by Res Ipsa
.........Phage..............
...what was that thing at the 2:35 mark in the video?

Lets see...I predict the answer would be one of the following.....

Bird
Ballon
Ice Particle
Debris
Junk
Lens Reflection
Pixel Error
Swamp Gas
Venus
Rock
Waste Dump


Take your pick....

Cheers!!!!

Don't forget Kite

its a great video which shows clearly unexplainable things. It's a shame some of the youtube comments were very ignorant and by people who havent done any research into ufo's and think its all nonesense.

Well made video, thanks for posting.
2nd

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow

Originally posted by RFBurns

Originally posted by Res Ipsa
.........Phage..............
...what was that thing at the 2:35 mark in the video?

Lets see...I predict the answer would be one of the following.....

Bird
Ballon
Ice Particle
Debris
Junk
Lens Reflection
Pixel Error
Swamp Gas
Venus
Rock
Waste Dump


Take your pick....

Cheers!!!!

Chuck Norris.

2nd line.

wZn

This is a common mistake made by most people... they assume it's Chuck Norris...
But Chuck has a lot of better things to be doing, like every woman on this planet.

Upon further investigation, it is 100% Billy Mayes, he's up there filming another commercial. He was using his glue to fix the satellite and space station, while giving the outside a nice detail with oxy clean.

Excellent posting.

Just imagine the dozens or hundreds of clips we are NOT seeing of UFO's....Officially, NASA will not admit or discuss UFO's.

Originally posted by RFBurns
Lets see...I predict the answer would be one of the following.....

Bird
Ballon
Ice Particle
Debris
Junk
Lens Reflection
Pixel Error
Swamp Gas
Venus
Rock
Waste Dump


Take your pick....

Cheers!!!!

Ummmm most likely...
Heat seeking missiles....
A bloodhound...
A Fox...
Barracudas...

Those are the OBVIOUS choices

(But on a serious note, first glance at it, and instant reaction was... "Did I just see a bird?")

Great thread. S&F





All wrong!
Its ball-lightning!


Zyk

[edit on 26-3-2009 by Zykloner]

This is the best 'nasa' video compilation i've seen. There are a few i haven't even seen yet.

The water drop UFO has been convincingly debunked, so we can throw that one out now. It seems pretty clear that it is a drop of water.

There were many that i can't explain.

There is so much information in this video that needs explained that if someone could break down all these videos and convincingly explain them away as being conventional in nature, i honestly would NEVER question any nasa footage again.

So, there is the challenge to anyone who thinks all of them can be explained. Provide links for the debunking process please. I would love to see some of the explanations for many of these videos and if they hold up.

reply to post by spacemanjupiter


Phage, the guantlet seems to be spinning on the floor after being thrown down with authority. I look forward to seeing this.

I'm going for popcorn.

Originally posted by RFBurns

Originally posted by Res Ipsa
.........Phage..............
...what was that thing at the 2:35 mark in the video?

Lets see...I predict the answer would be one of the following.....

Bird
Ballon
Ice Particle
Debris
Junk
Lens Reflection
Pixel Error
Swamp Gas
Venus
Rock
Waste Dump


Take your pick....

Cheers!!!!

Oh, RFBurns, I woke up all creative and you stole every possible scenario I could think of.

Greeat find. Starred & flagged for you!

[edit on 26-3-2009 by Exopolitico]

The shape shifter video looked like it was filmed at the bottom of the sea, the "unidentified swiming object" even had legs, and looked like some kind of shrimp-type-of-animal. I couldn't connect the background of the video to space either. Just something that hit me.

For the other video clips, i think some of them are pretty cool. It's a great compilation

I'm surprised the debunkers haven't flocked to this thread yet. Just give them some time. They're meeting to devise their strategy.

Even if one of the objects shown on this video is real, how much more proof do we need to say that life outside of our planet is not only possible; it is a reality.


[edit on 26-3-2009 by Exopolitico]

The Apollo command module: The white dot is, yes, ice from the LM. The high gain antenna on the command module doesn't "track" anything, it's for communication with Earth. As can be seen in this video, even in the olden days our space vehicles produced ice.
space.about.com...

The ice on the STS-115 video is being discussed elsewhere.

The object in the Apollo 16 video is the external floodlight on the command module. You can even see the boom. spacefiles.blogspot.com...

Here is what frame 26 from Zond 3 looks like. It looks like quite a bit of prettifying was done to the version in the video.
www.mentallandscape.com...


ISS - 7:

After the ISS attitude transition on 6/12, the crew noticed a small, shiny, free-floating metallic object about 30 m (100 ft) from the Lab nadir window, moving very slowly away from the ISS. The leading theory was that the object is a cable label. [A photo of a cable label, uplinked from the ground, was later examined by Ed Lu. He confirmed the possibility that the object he saw indeed could have been a cable label. Further identification of the object by ground teams is still underway. Limited tracking data the object on 6/12 showed it below the ISS and 1.7 km in front. Preliminary predictions indicated it was slowly separating, and the specialists did/do not believe it poses a re-contact hazard to the station.

www.spaceref.com...

A bunch of ice and debris of various sorts. Much of which has been discussed many times.

The object transiting the moon is a weather balloon, as explained by the astronomer that filmed it. The apparent change in direction is due to the combination of the motion of the moon and the tracking of the telescope. www.abovetopsecret.com...

Alberto Mayer, on October 1, 2007, said: Thank you Duncan, i noticed that the news corrupts very easily passing from mouth to mouth... A methamorphosis occur... I am an "amateur" astronomer... probably the word "amateur" was missing. Someone published "MY" words that i "NEVER" said about UFOs. That's life... Lot of people does Bla, bla, bla bla.... About the object motion: the object do moves (floating in the air) but its true motion relative to the observer is different by the motion relative to the moon because the Moon has its appearent motion too and my telescope was tracking the moom motion. Resuming: it is needed to subtract the lunar motion in order to get the real path of the object.... we did it and we noticed that the spectacular inversion of direction doesn't exist: the object moves always in the same direction. About Moon images: thank you if you like this one but did you see the original size of the infrared moon? The detail is much higher. Greetings Alberto

www.panoramio.com...


[edit on 3/26/2009 by Phage]

What about the shadow going across the moon Phage?

What's your take on that. The change in direction means it's most certainly NOT a natural thing. (IMO)

Wow very nice video. I even watched it again to show my roommate. Very interesting stuff. Do you have any links as to where some of these videos came from?

Oh my how your credibility goes out the window when you start posting water droplets on the lens and other dirt and debris. I just loved that part the most.

Oh and reflections of flashes on the windows.

This ia why people DON'T believe anything, because we have people like this making videos.

[edit on 26-3-2009 by rocksarerocks]

Originally posted by skeptic_al

Originally posted by GEORGETHEGREEK
Its a world of wonders, some hidden some publicly allowed!

I choose to live and enjoy the obvious ones while keeping an eye for the ones having potential to be!

Enjoy and leave some feedback

[edit on 25/3/2009 by GEORGETHEGREEK]

Most of those could easily be explained, and all of those I have see before.
Some you can't say either way, too blurry (naturally)
And a couple could be classified as true Unidentified Flying Objects but
I wouldn't put Alien In front, they are just Unidentified.

What if some are living creatures that the gov/ NASA doesn't tell us about?

?

In preparation for a book I am currently working on, I have found so many similarities between what would be defined as spiritual entities and UFO activities. Watching your great video, I am so reminded that perhaps, just perhaps we are all asking the wrong question here. There is truly no question that we are indeed being visited, but is there a chance that these creatures don’t exist in our physical realm, and instead be more spiritual in nature? The ability to move in and out of our visible spectrum, the ability to effortlessly move at a whim in our atmosphere or in the vacuum of space truly brings up many probabilities. These can be answered by the possibility of a highly advanced culture with advance technologies, but could also be answered with a spiritual definition as well. Just a thought and I did enjoy your clips. There were a few that I had not seen before. Great job!

The shapeshifting one looks like a slinky to me. Could one of the astronauts have been playing w/ a slinky on the moon...you know in between hitting 3 and 5 irons into deep space- and possible figured he'd just toss it out into the abyss when he was done?

I dunno, alot of this stuff does look like ice, space debris, satellites, I like the floodlight on the moon, (yea you can see the boom, thats classic, I was looking for Dr Manhatten in the astronauts visor....) lol.

Yet the tether, and the circular light formation still seem to stump me a bit. Although I would imagine some of these things could be lens anomolies. I'm not an expert on cameras, or video, or lenses. Nor am I an expert on how these things would behave in space.

Nice compilation though.

S+F

reply to post by GEORGETHEGREEK


I have a question (for anyone in the know) regarding the MIR Space Station segment of the OP video. Who is filming the MIR? Also, around the 3:10 mark, is that a satellite flyby that obscures the MIR for a split second? Is it just my imagination or was that the focal point of adding the MIR segment? When I first watched the video I thought our attention was suppose to focus on the white dots hovering around the station. I could have just missed the point of this segment. But can anyone verify the flyby?

Edited to add link to animation showing flyby:



[edit on 26-3-2009 by papajake]

[edit on 26-3-2009 by papajake]