It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DocEmrick
Haven't plowed through all 3 pages yet, but I do want to say this:
You guys can't be believing every Tom, Dick and Jane that comes out and says they've seen aliens, or shared Starbucks with an alien, or shared a candle-lit Italian dinner with Gorgan the night before she left for Zeta Reticulai (or whatever it's called).
Also keep in mind, that there are plenty of disinformation "agents" out there. If the government, or some shadow organization came to you and offered you a lifetime of security, and $10,000 a month for the rest of your life, and all you had to do was go on C2C or write a tabloid editor, etc; that you were walking down the street and an alien jumped out...would you do it? Probably not, because you're on ATS. And it doesn't stop there, there are plenty of hoaxers and attention hogs (was going to use a stronger word for a woman who sleeps with muchos menos), but in any case...look at the Haiti Video, look at the drones. And those were more believable then somebody talking on a radio show! Come on guys, the more ridiculous they make the UFOlogy field look, the more closer they are to winning out on those who seek the truth.
Originally posted by awake_awoke
S&F all the way.
Now, is there any way we can get a copy of this tape.....
Originally posted by converge
Originally posted by carole9999
Are you seriously comparing the AFOSI unfounded claim of misinformation with Schneider's claim? Same difference.
Even if I was basing my statement merely on a AFOSI claim, it's not the same difference.
We know for a fact that Government and Military intelligence agencies routinely wage disinformation campaigns. On the other hand, while we have our suspicions and beliefs we just don't know that there are even aliens on our planet, much less waging wars in underground bases.
I'm sorry but that's hardly the same difference.
Do you believe the government on everything to do with this topic?
I don't believe anything the Government says regarding this topic, but my statement isn't based on a AFOSI admission; because for starters they never officially admitted to the disinformation campaign against Bennewitz.
Secondly there are numerous serious researchers who have looked into the Bennewitz/Doty/Moore affair and reached those conclusions.
How many researchers have vouched for Schneider's credibility? 0? How many witnesses are there that confirm Schneider's claims? None?
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Wolf’s book Catcher’s of Heaven described a firefight between ETs and elite US military forces that had occurred in 1975 at the Groom Lake, Nevada facility that may have been related to what occurred later at the nearby Dulce:
The Greys shared certain of their technological advances with military/intelligence scientists, apparently often while prisoner "guests" within secure underground military installations in Nevada and New Mexico. The extraterrestrials have given the U.S. government some of their antigravity craft and a huge amount of fuel (element 115). On May 1, 1975 during one such technology exchange in Nevada, a demonstration of a small ET antimatter reactor, the lead Grey asked the Colonel in charge of the Delta Forces guarding the ETs to remove all their rifles and bullets from the room, (so that they would not accidentally discharge during the energy emissions.)
Originally posted by carole9999
So you don't believe the government disinfo, but you are stating that secondhand 'research' on government disinfo is more credible than Schneider?
Originally posted by carole9999
No, not satellites--there are far too many of them. More importantly, they move suddenly and change course abruptly at tremendous speed. When they drop down, it is always vertical and extremely fast--an event I've witnessed at least ten times in the last two months. The reason I believe they are terrestrial is because of my proximity to WSMR. This, of course, does not provide evidence either way, terrestrial, joint, or ET, just speculation on my part. They do not stay in a stationary position as a star would do, instead they seem to be in constant (albeit slight) motion.
projectcamelot.net...
The first section of this page was written by Phil Schneider
Originally posted by homeskillet
Originally posted by carole9999
No, not satellites--there are far too many of them. More importantly, they move suddenly and change course abruptly at tremendous speed. When they drop down, it is always vertical and extremely fast--an event I've witnessed at least ten times in the last two months. The reason I believe they are terrestrial is because of my proximity to WSMR. This, of course, does not provide evidence either way, terrestrial, joint, or ET, just speculation on my part. They do not stay in a stationary position as a star would do, instead they seem to be in constant (albeit slight) motion.
if you see these things that regularly then why dont you take video? it may go a long way to prove the very points you're trying to make.
Originally posted by drock905
How about the witnesses are just lying for attention or money. Or how about the radio station made it up for ratings?
Originally posted by Salt of the Earth
The reason the underground military bases are referred to as "black ops military" is because this is the secret military. Just like the Vatican has a black pope who really runs the show.