Princess Diana a version of the truth?

Ok guys, here is something I posted in RATS for some thoughts, I promised I'd post it here for all to see. It's skunked up to the eyeballs though, can't give the name of the source.

I had a meeting with a guy who works closely with celebrities world wide, this guy was generous, welcoming and I respect him although I only met him once for a period of 3 hours. Amoungst many other things he told me this...

In our conversation I mentioned I believed Prince Andrew had AIDS, he corrected me and said he had HIV but this is a generally well kept secret, much like the secret of Harry being on the frontline.

"In deciding to deploy [the Prince] to Afghanistan, it was my judgment that with an understanding with the media not to broadcast his whereabouts, the risk in doing so was manageable,"

www.time.com...

He then told me this was tenuously linked to the death of Princess Diana...
Prince Andrew has had HIV for over 10 years, the early plan was to tell the public he was ill but not HIV, they (the Royals) were going to say he had cancer, a much more socially acceptable disease that doesn't point towards non hetrosexual tendencies.
So the information didn't cause mass public interest it was due to be released at the same time as the Queen Mother went in for her first hip operation, as morbid as this sounds, she was expected to die and at this point the information about the prince would be released. A kind of smoke screen.
The Queen Mother did not die at this point so the information remained hidden.

Over the next few years it is said that Diana grew tired of the Royal Family and the deceit within, whether she wanted to blow the story or escape the family altogether I am uncertain but in this interview with Martin Bashir she talks about disguising AIDS as cancer, Bashir knows the truth as most people in the media do nowadays but knows he can't push it.

DIANA: Well, with William and Harry, for instance, I take them round homelessness projects, I ve taken William and Harry to people dying of Aids - albeit I told them it was cancer.

www.bbc.co.uk...

After this interview it became apparent to the Royals that they needed to do something about Diana who was a liability. They were not going to kill her, they were going to frighten her.
Henri Paul was her driver on the night she died. He had previously worked for the French Secret Service and according to Muhamed Al-fayed had links with the English SS. After Diana's death large amounts of money were found in his bank account an alleged payment from the English SS on behalf of the royal family. In return for the money he was to take Diana away that night to an arranged place for her to be 'frightened' into silence, unfortunately they crashed and she died on the way. I am told that the crash itself was indeed a horrific mistake.
www.dailymail.co.uk...

This theory is not unknown but is worth mentioning.
Like I say, I cannot reveal the source but I trust him I guess.

One other thing...(way off topic)
I have been without internet for about 4 weeks, I know this is asking a lot but I fear I have missed some good threads. Would someone mind pointing me in the direction of anything big I have missed? Unfortunatley I can only repay your efforts with kind words

My take on the royals -

I am not convinced that there was a conspiracy when Diana died, other then incompetent doctors and/or emergency workers not responding fast enough or in the right manner. I haven't seen enough to convince me that the royals had her whacked.

I'm open to being convinced.
If anyone would like to post info that will sway me ... please do!

Harry being sent to the front lines could be someones way of trying to get rid of him. I still wonder about his parentage. He looks like Diana's lover. I know that the public was told she didn't take him as a lover until much later. But the resemblence is too close to just brush off.

Andrew with HIV? I doubt it. He's still too hunky to be that sick.

Camella? She's a stinky bar hag.

Charles? He's looney. His mom made him that way.

William? If he's smart he'll RUN from that dysfunctional family and never look back.

Hmmm interesting!

Thank you so very much for sharing this with us. Probably the first "conspiracy" I ever took liking to when I was younger was that of Diana and I have always followed everything I could about it.

The money itself in Mr. Paul's account (and the 1200 in his wallet) I am not too surprised to see so I don't personally consider it a smoking gun in its own right.

I have never heard the AIDS theory until now and I must admit I am extremely intrigued....

reply to post by FlyersFan

Yeah man, he mentioned Harry was not Phillip's, think he said it was James Hewitt. He also mentioned another royal whose mother had an affair, can't remember who though.

reply to post by and14263


Harry is Philip's Son ?

Good grief. A dysfunctional family indeed

Diana's driver was drunk. End of. If Andrew has HIV that's between him and his maker. Camilla an old hag ? She looks a decent person to me. Charles a loon ? Hardly surprising considering the hand he's been dealt.

It's just trivia, really, this Royal stuff. Pure candyfloss for idiots.

Well my immediate intuition when it happened was that something was fishy.
This makes more sense to me than that they out right killed her.
So cool share. Who knows?

MAN!
I just saw this thread.
That's some pretty freaky stuff!
I haven't looked into it, yet. There aren't many 'Princess Diana' threads!
Good job!

originally posted by: FlyersFan
My take on the royals -

I am not convinced that there was a conspiracy when Diana died, other then incompetent doctors and/or emergency workers not responding fast enough or in the right manner. I haven't seen enough to convince me that the royals had her whacked.

I'm open to being convinced.
If anyone would like to post info that will sway me ... please do!

Harry being sent to the front lines could be someones way of trying to get rid of him. I still wonder about his parentage. He looks like Diana's lover. I know that the public was told she didn't take him as a lover until much later. But the resemblence is too close to just brush off.

Andrew with HIV? I doubt it. He's still too hunky to be that sick.

Camella? She's a stinky bar hag.

Charles? He's looney. His mom made him that way.

William? If he's smart he'll RUN from that dysfunctional family and never look back.

Those are quite some allegations. Are you not aware that the male HRH's traditionally serve in the military? Was there a plot to kill off all of them? What evidence do you present for your claim that he was sent to the front lines to die? Who gave the order to send him to the front lines? Who engineered this assassination attempt? Why would they wait all these years when they could have bumped him off in his cradle?

Why is Camilla a "stinky bar hag"? You can't even spell her name so I assume you don't know her.

Why is Charles "looney"? How did his mother make him that way? Do you know him personally?

You've made a series of scurrilous claims. How about backing them up?

For some reason I can't imagine Diana with a big burning desire to engage in public discourse about someone's potentially terminal illness, albeit a Prince. Other things maybe, but not that.

She never struck me as being that kind of person.

Can't believe this thread is almost six years old!

a reply to: Tangerine

Aaarrgghh!! Every time I read threads there are posts from Tangerine requesting 'evidence'... Sometimes there is no evidence, sometimes people are putting ideas out there for discussion - brainstorming, whatever you want to call it. Theories are often just theories with no evidence, Occam's Razor or analysis of probabilities is sometimes the only way to decide.

Read what you quoted: "Harry being sent to the front lines could be someones way of trying to get rid of him." The poster has made a suggestion for discussion!

Almost every post you write requests evidence... !!! I'm actually laughing right now.

Princess Diana = a brood mare brought in to provide offspring for Charlie and removed from the scene after that was accomplished. End of the story!

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: Tangerine

Aaarrgghh!! Every time I read threads there are posts from Tangerine requesting 'evidence'... Sometimes there is no evidence, sometimes people are putting ideas out there for discussion - brainstorming, whatever you want to call it. Theories are often just theories with no evidence, Occam's Razor or analysis of probabilities is sometimes the only way to decide.

Read what you quoted: "Harry being sent to the front lines could be someones way of trying to get rid of him." The poster has made a suggestion for discussion!

Almost every post you write requests evidence... !!! I'm actually laughing right now.

She was suggesting that that might have occurred. I was discussing her suggestion. She followed that with scurrilous comments about other individuals. Is this simply a forum for trashing people we envy?

Scientific theories are based on testable evidence. I think you mean hypotheses not theories.

Brainstorming implies using one's brains and that includes asking questions and asking for evidence.

Apply Occam's Razor and an analysis of probabilities to the suggestion that Prince Harry was sent to Afghanistan to be bumped off. I'd be interested in seeing how that works.

a reply to: Tangerine

I love you Tangerine.

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: Tangerine

I love you Tangerine.

LOL. I love it! I'm going to copy and save it. Thanks.

P.S.: How do I copy and paste it elsewhere? Serious question.

a reply to: and14263

the problem with your :

" prince andrew has AIDS // HIV claim "

is that you are linking it to events of 20 years ago

yet HRH has nad no public // publicised medical episodes and has appeared in good health at public engagements throught those 2 decades [ with no unexplained absences ]

a reply to: Tangerine

Is this simply a forum for trashing people we envy?

Envy? Thats an assumption... Can you provide evidence of this envy please?

or to quote you:

Got evidence to prove that claim?

Where's the evidence?

Could you be massively short of evidence? Yes.

Based on what evidence?

Or would you prefer that we go directly from accusation to conviction and skip the hard evidence part?

So, lets get this right, you can make accusations without evidence but the rest of ATS cant?

a reply to: and14263

oooooooooooohhhh!! Juicy, this is the kind of thing i love reading. i can well believe it about randy andy pandy. i can't stand the royals apart from Diana,William and Harry and no, i don't think he looks like James Hewitt whatsoever, he's the double of Charles.

I wonder what Diana would have thought of Kate? I don't like Kate wearing Dianas ring, im not sure about Kate.

thanks for sharing,

do you know if Diana was pregnant when she died?

cheers.

a reply to: slippeddisc
I don't know if Diana was pregnant but I do know that out of all that bunch Kate and Will are your safest bet. Harry too. Kate was brought up in circles that allowed her to meet the Prince and they got together. Will isn't as geeky as you think and Harry - he went and got caught doing stupid stuff that teenagers do. Those three are pretty normal so far as Princes and the upper class go. Nothing seedy or badly motivated in their lives.

All that from someone who doesn't like the Royals! I must be getting soft.

a reply to: and14263

excellent stuff!

is there anything else you might of forgot about?