It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Originally posted by miriam0566
but when it comes to jesus, and a story that implies that each of us are personally responsible for the lives we lead, well, suddenly there is no proof.
Ah, my favorite fool is at it again!
[edit on 11/3/2009 by Neo Christian Mystic]
Originally posted by ExistenceUnknown
In regards to the miracles that were performed by Jesus and Christians. Would it not be possible that someone like David Copperfield would be considered a God back then? Someone who is really good at illusion claiming to be the Son of God back in a time when scientific investigation as we know it did not exist.
.. You think if he said he was the descendant of their God they would take him seriously?
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Originally posted by miriam0566
but when it comes to jesus, and a story that implies that each of us are personally responsible for the lives we lead, well, suddenly there is no proof.
Ah, my favorite fool is at it again!
[edit on 11/3/2009 by Neo Christian Mystic]
Originally posted by miriam0566
fools should be ignored. so feel free to use the ignore button
Originally posted by miriam0566
what would you consider extraordinary proof?
those resurrected by jesus died again.
those who were healed eventually died too.
those who witnessed jesus' live did write about it.
what exactly do you feel would prove it too you?
no, thats not what im saying. im christian, as such i dont believe buddha or mohammed to be true prophets. however i noted that they do have a following.
i know the word sheeple gets thrown around alot, but you have to remember, people back then believed the religion you were raised in. especially the jews of that time. for another religion to come along and actually preach and to say to people to change was unheard of in that time.
im saying that the fact that it even took off is a strong testament that jesus was a real person in of itself.
things did not get ugly until after the first century and even then, it didnt really get bad until the 4th.
im not lumping people who arent persuaded by my beliefs. im lumping people who denied that jesus ever existed.
im doing this because it requires the same mindset to make that claim.
its a way of thinking. you have something that was unquestioned for nearly 1800 years, then suddenly someone says "hey, jesus might not have ever existed".
its the denying of something that is inconvenient to accept.
if you dont believe or follow the bible, thats your choice. but to say that jesus might not have ever existed is pointless. why would you even care? some do care because its something they wish would go away.
you might not understand because maybe it really is inconsequential to you. but for some that are bitter towards past faiths, they seem to be the ones who argue this passionately
Originally posted by 5thElement
What was Frodo Baggins doing on September 22, 2980 T.A. ?
Celebrating his birthday, perhaps ?
The thing is, we will never know, because Frodo is not real, anything we will ever know about him can be found in one of the most greatest stories of all time
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Originally posted by 5thElement
What was Frodo Baggins doing on September 22, 2980 T.A. ?
Celebrating his birthday, perhaps ?
The thing is, we will never know, because Frodo is not real, anything we will ever know about him can be found in one of the most greatest stories of all time
Most scholars agree that Jesus was a historical person. Whether he was divine or not is what they don't agree on.
Show me a scholar that believes Frodo was a real historical person.
Originally posted by gYvMessanger
I don't think you can claim the man Jesus wasn't real, if so why is their no evidence from the time Christianity started stating that he never existed as opposed to simply trying to denounce him as a madman and a liar.