It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by zerotensor
And that is supposed to mean what?
Originally posted by zerotensor
Of course, non-stabilized original frames would be the best evidence, one way or the other.
Originally posted by trusername
probably a silly question - but wouldn't a hot pixel be moving when the asteroid isn't about to hit it as well as when it is?
are you saying that the other Italian footage and the old nasa footage with these zigzagging orbs are also hot pixels?
I'm just wondering why 2 out of three seem to be most active when dodging something.
But maybe you can explain that with close up techniques or something? In other words - it's always moving like that and ATSers should be able to make it do it when the asteroid is farther away?
Originally posted by IAttackPeople
I emailed Professor Quijano, who produced the animation, and got a short reply.
He says the "UFO" is digital noise and not a real body.
What Italian footage?
Originally posted by trusername
are you saying that the other Italian footage and the old nasa footage with these zigzagging orbs are also hot pixels?
Originally posted by ngchunter
I find it telling that the x axis is a sine wave and the y axis is a near constant slope. That says to me it's got something to do with different drift issues by the Dec and RA drives of the scope.