It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Originally posted by melatonin
A point I wanted evidence for by my third post, but you still haz none.
I showed you evidence. 90% of scientists say "Evolution" is a fact AND a theory at the SAME time.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
I have no problem with the statement "The Theory of Evolution is not a fact". I know it's true. Evolutionists have a problem with it though
Originally posted by iWork4NWO
Originally posted by B.A.C.
I have no problem with the statement "The Theory of Evolution is not a fact". I know it's true. Evolutionists have a problem with it though
Sorry but that's just bull#. Us, biologists are not claiming that the theory of evolution is a fact. I'm involved in a research group where we very much want to disprove a little something concerning the theory
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Perfect, I really hope you do prove your little part of the theory wrong. I'd say this thread proves they do have a problem with it though. Or else why all the discussion? Nothing to discuss if you agree is there?
[edit on 9-3-2009 by B.A.C.]
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Again I know of no theory called "Evolution" so they are wrong either way, and only came up with this idea about it being fact and/or theory to discredit Creationists.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
OK I'l be one of the religious nuts to respond
In science, the word theory is used as a plausible general principle or body of principles offered to explain a phenomenon.
The word is derived from Greek θεωρία theoria (Jerome), Greek "contemplation, speculation"
en.wikipedia.org...
Why don't I believe in evolution?
It is speculation.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
No I didn't refute General Relativity, I confirmed it (look up Straw Man), the OP's whole premise is that theories are more than speculation, which in most cases I agree with.
In the case of evolution the facts aren't known, I couldn't have said it better myself.
Point made.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
OK show me a FACT, just one FACT, not ALL, just ONE that is known about evolution.
Remember a FACT is VERIFIABLE.
Is this a setup too
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Originally posted by FritosBBQTwist
reply to post by B.A.C.
...
Regardless of your comments, evolution still has a LOT of proof behind it
Yes, it has a lot of proof, just not enough to be considered fact.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
OK I'm starting to see spots. I've been on this thread since 10 am this morning, it is now 2 am (16 hrs). While I've been working on client stuff from home, hopefully all their stuff will still run LMAO
Anyways, I'll continue on tomorrow.
Down with evolution (I'm on topic)
Originally posted by B.A.C.
reply to post by jfj123
Prove that evolution is a lie? Is that what this thread is coming to?
Gravitational Theory - explains the LAW of Gravity.
Electromagnetic Theory - explains the many LAWS of electricity.
But
The Theory of Evolution - attempts to explain it's own theory.
Cheers.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
So by Thursday you can PROVE evolution?
Go read many quotes by leading scientist that admit they have a LOT of the answers concerning evolution, but not ALL of the answers.
Is there evidence for evolution? Absolutely.
Is there lot's of evidence for evolution? Possibly.
Can you or anyone else say you have all the answers for evolution? Nope.
Therefore it is not fact yet. It is still just a theory, no matter how you'd like to redefine theory.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Is Evolution a fact? Yes
It's the only "fact and theory" associated with this idea of dual meanings. Wonder why?
Originally posted by B.A.C
I never heard of any theory called "Evolution". I heard of one called "The Theory of Evolution" or "Evolutionary Theory".
Originally posted by hulkbacker
When has anyone observed "evolution" working on the scale that the "theory of evolution" claims that it has been responsible for?
Thats what seperates the "theory of evolution" from the fact of evolution, IMO.
The observed fact of evolution is this...
"Very simple things have been observed to evolve into other similar, very simple things.
Very complex things have been observed to evlove very simple changes within those very complex things."
The "theory of evolution" is that these to facts, along with some other data lead to the idea that all variation of all life can be attributed to the same process that define the fact of evolution.
This part is still a theory, and should only be treated as such.
Originally posted by hulkbacker
This really gets to the heart of the matter. A theist looks for "why"?, a naturalist ignores the question.
Originally posted by hulkbacker
This is where naturalism is self defeating, IMO. When you trace back all the "why?" you are left with nothing but, "it just is". And you can't allow yourself to ask the next "why?". Because by definition that answer can only be found in the Supernatural.
Originally posted by hulkbacker
A theist has that supernatural answer.
Originally posted by hulkbacker
When it comes to the quesion of "why is what we can observe and detect the way it is?"
Given the properties of what we know, the simplest answer is that something outside it caused it to be so. Afterall, thats how all the things we know of came to be as we now see them.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Evolution is NOT a theory. I know of no theory called "Evolution"
Originally posted by hulkbacker
Given the properties of what we know, the simplest answer is that something outside it caused it to be so. Afterall, thats how all the things we know of came to be as we now see them.
Originally posted by 5thElement
Nature does not need an ULTIMATE or FIRST cause.
From the scientific point of view, infinite causality chain is as acceptable as finite one. Nothing contradicts it
Ultimate cause is only necessary when you try to fit concept of God in
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Evolution is NOT a theory. I know of no theory called "Evolution"
Originally posted by melatonin
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Evolution is NOT a theory. I know of no theory called "Evolution"
You obviously forgot. You did a few days back.
The evidence is in the quotes above. You can dance around the evidence of your own words and usage, but its crystal.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Evolution is NOT a theory. I know of no theory called "Evolution"
Ask anyone on the streets if they believe in evolution.
Let's see what the majority believes "evolution" is referring to (I'm going to pull a '90%' out of my arse, but it will probably be higher than that ).
What matters isn't the word but the meaning and the context - you fail to see that.
Originally posted by B.A.C
The Theory of X - is X a theory? or a fact?
Originally posted by hulkbacker
When has anyone observed "evolution" working on the scale that the "theory of evolution" claims that it has been responsible for?