It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blujay
And here's a snip from our local paper today:
www.santacruzsentinel.com...
"Our best guess is that it was a sonic boom from a jet off the coast," Gordon said. "That's all we can say scientifically."
[edit on 5-3-2009 by blujay]
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
reply to post by dneudecker
I don't really think an airshow would account for the increased sonic boom activity, if these are even sonic booms. The only local shows I can find coming up are in Yuma and El Centro next weekend.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA AIRSHOWS
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
reply to post by dneudecker
I don't really think an airshow would account for the increased sonic boom activity, if these are even sonic booms. The only local shows I can find coming up are in Yuma and El Centro next weekend.
Originally posted by Rollinster
Funny thing is, most of the links posted that present the story by the media specifically state (mostly) that it was NOT a sonic boom.
I think one report tried to put that into play but that was what, 400 miles away?
edit for terminology mistake
[edit on 5-3-2009 by Rollinster]
Originally posted by Iago18
reply to post by zerotensor
This does seem to be something that would fall in the neighborhood of that line of research, though HAARP does seem to be used to be a deus ex machina on these sort of things.
Originally posted by zerotensor
That said, it was my interest in a similar "mystery boom" many years ago which led me to investigate the very real geophysical technology which has been deployed on the planet. HAARP is only one component of a much larger, very complex system.
After discovering a host of glaring correlations between "glitches" in apparently unrelated geophysical data in the public domain, the government-sponsored sources of those data sets have acted to obfuscate and discontinue dissemination of new data. These actions by themselves have stoked my suspicion-- If the correlations I was investigating were truly spurious, then why was such focused action taken to "plug the leaks"?